Abstract
By integrating the insights from social identity research on
collective action, this article examines the social-psychological
mechanisms behind the emergence of the 2019–20 ‘Chile
despert o’ social movement, a major Latin American revolt
against the government’s price hikes. Using survey data collected
among Chilean activists (N = 549) and non-activists
(i.e., members of broader society, N = 234), we analyse two
major explanatory collective action frameworks: that is, the
social identity model of collective action (SIMCA) and the
encapsulation model of the social identity of collective action
(EMSICA). Multi-group SEM with latent variables revealed
that the EMSICA was slightly better suited as compared to
SIMCA to explain collective action on behalf of newly formed
collective identities. As concerns prosocial disobedience,
these attitudes predicted collective action intentions indirectly
through social identification among both activists and
non-activists. The indirect effects of moral outrage were
found to be more pronounced in non-activists, whereas perceived collective efficacy had stronger direct mobilizing
effects among activists. The discussion highlights the importance
of studying individuals’ prosocial disobedience attitudes
within social identity models of collective action. Please refer
to the Supplementary Material section to find this article’s
Community and Social Impact Statement.
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
pagine (da-a) | 830-845 |
Numero di pagine | 16 |
Rivista | Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology |
DOI | |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2022 |
Keywords
- Chile
- collective action
- collective efficacy
- prosocial disobedience
- protesters