TY - JOUR
T1 - Colposcopy Accuracy and Diagnostic Performance: A Quality Control and Quality Assurance Survey in Italian Tertiary-Level Teaching and Academic Institutions—The Italian Society of Colposcopy and Cervico-Vaginal Pathology (SICPCV)
AU - Origoni, Massimo
AU - Cantatore, Francesco
AU - Sopracordevole, Francesco
AU - Clemente, Nicolò
AU - Spinillo, Arsenio
AU - Gardella, Barbara
AU - De Vincenzo, Rosa Pasqualina
AU - Ricci, Caterina
AU - Landoni, Fabio
AU - Di Meo, Maria Letizia
AU - Ciavattini, Andrea
AU - Di Giuseppe, Jacopo
AU - Preti, Eleonora
AU - Iacobone, Anna Daniela
AU - Carriero, Carmine
AU - Dellino, Miriam
AU - Capodanno, Massimo
AU - Perino, Antonino
AU - Miglioli, Cesare
AU - Insolia, Luca
AU - Barbero, Maggiorino
AU - Candiani, Massimo
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA) principles are essential for effective cervical cancer prevention. Being a crucial diagnostic step, colposcopy’s sensitivity and specificity improvements are strongly advocated worldwide since inter- and intra-observer differences are the main limiting factors. The objective of the present study was the evaluation of colposcopy accuracy through the results of a QC/QA assessment from a survey in Italian tertiary-level academic and teaching hospitals. A web-based, user-friendly platform based on 100 colposcopic digital images was forwarded to colposcopists with different levels of experience. Seventy-three participants were asked to identify colposcopic patterns, provide personal impressions, and indicate the correct clinical practice. The data were correlated with a panel of experts’ evaluation and with the clinical/pathological data of the cases. Overall sensitivity and specificity with the threshold of CIN2+ accounted for 73.7% and 87.7%, respectively, with minor differences between senior and junior candidates. Identification and interpretation of colposcopic patterns showed full agreement with the experts’ panel, ranging from 50% to 82%, in some instances with better results from junior colposcopists. Colposcopic impressions correlated with a 20% underestimation of CIN2+ lesions, with no differences linked to level of experience. Our results demonstrate the good diagnostic performance of colposcopy and the need for improving accuracy through QC assessments and adhesion to standard requirements and recommendations.
AB - Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA) principles are essential for effective cervical cancer prevention. Being a crucial diagnostic step, colposcopy’s sensitivity and specificity improvements are strongly advocated worldwide since inter- and intra-observer differences are the main limiting factors. The objective of the present study was the evaluation of colposcopy accuracy through the results of a QC/QA assessment from a survey in Italian tertiary-level academic and teaching hospitals. A web-based, user-friendly platform based on 100 colposcopic digital images was forwarded to colposcopists with different levels of experience. Seventy-three participants were asked to identify colposcopic patterns, provide personal impressions, and indicate the correct clinical practice. The data were correlated with a panel of experts’ evaluation and with the clinical/pathological data of the cases. Overall sensitivity and specificity with the threshold of CIN2+ accounted for 73.7% and 87.7%, respectively, with minor differences between senior and junior candidates. Identification and interpretation of colposcopic patterns showed full agreement with the experts’ panel, ranging from 50% to 82%, in some instances with better results from junior colposcopists. Colposcopic impressions correlated with a 20% underestimation of CIN2+ lesions, with no differences linked to level of experience. Our results demonstrate the good diagnostic performance of colposcopy and the need for improving accuracy through QC assessments and adhesion to standard requirements and recommendations.
KW - CIN
KW - QA
KW - QC
KW - SIL
KW - cervical cancer prevention
KW - colposcopy
KW - colposcopy sensitivity
KW - colposcopy standards
KW - diagnostic accuracy
KW - CIN
KW - QA
KW - QC
KW - SIL
KW - cervical cancer prevention
KW - colposcopy
KW - colposcopy sensitivity
KW - colposcopy standards
KW - diagnostic accuracy
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/281297
U2 - 10.3390/diagnostics13111906
DO - 10.3390/diagnostics13111906
M3 - Article
SN - 2075-4418
VL - 13
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Diagnostics
JF - Diagnostics
ER -