Abstract
Legal reasoning, from the decision of United Chambers of Supreme Court, through the
legal assistance activity carried out by a lawyer, to the purchase of an object on Amazon
by a common citizen (which integrates a contractual constraint), contains in itself
assessments of opportunity and moral evaluation, problem solving, decision making and,
in general, a cognitive activation very wide ranging. Thanks to the multidisciplinary
vocation of neuroscience, in particular focused at the cognitive field in legal practice, the
aim of the research in cognitive neuroscience applied to law is to help to bridge the lack
of in-depth analysis in the decision-making processes that the main players of the law,
such as judges and lawyers, are informed. And all this, taking into account the ethical
issues that occur above all in the comparative analysis of neuroscience-law interaction.
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
pagine (da-a) | 83-91 |
Numero di pagine | 9 |
Rivista | Neuropsychological Trends |
DOI | |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2020 |
Pubblicato esternamente | Sì |
Keywords
- cognitive neuroscience
- legal decision
- legal reasoning
- neurolaw