TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical trials in nanotechnologies: The role of the research ethics committees (RECs)
AU - Spagnolo, Antonio Gioacchino
AU - Minacori, Roberta
AU - Daloiso, Viviana
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Research Ethics Committees (RECs) can be defined as independent bodies composed of people with various fields of expertise, includingmedical
and scientific but not only those, who are responsible for ensuring that
the biomedical research projects involving human subjects conform to
the principles of biomedical research. The RECs are an ethical guarantee
to protect the safety, integrity and rights involved in the experimentations
and to avoid the recurrence of scientific and economic abuse. They are
also a legal guarantee because their reviewing activities are acknowledged
in national and international rules and regulations.
Clinical trials in Nanotechnologymay represent a challenge for RECs in so
far they must verify that the chosen methodologies are the most adequate
to the aims of the protocols, in a context, that of nanotechnologies, characterized by many unknown and uncertainties with regards to particle
toxicity, and interaction with the human body.
For this reason, the REC should verify the risk to be assessed in terms of
probability, magnitude and duration and verify the identification in the
protocol of all those elements thatmay influence the risk, a risk that within
nanotechnology represent an element hard to be identified. The role of
RECs within Nanotechnology s clinical trials may be, then, decisive in the
formulation of more specific operating procedures in this field.
AB - Research Ethics Committees (RECs) can be defined as independent bodies composed of people with various fields of expertise, includingmedical
and scientific but not only those, who are responsible for ensuring that
the biomedical research projects involving human subjects conform to
the principles of biomedical research. The RECs are an ethical guarantee
to protect the safety, integrity and rights involved in the experimentations
and to avoid the recurrence of scientific and economic abuse. They are
also a legal guarantee because their reviewing activities are acknowledged
in national and international rules and regulations.
Clinical trials in Nanotechnologymay represent a challenge for RECs in so
far they must verify that the chosen methodologies are the most adequate
to the aims of the protocols, in a context, that of nanotechnologies, characterized by many unknown and uncertainties with regards to particle
toxicity, and interaction with the human body.
For this reason, the REC should verify the risk to be assessed in terms of
probability, magnitude and duration and verify the identification in the
protocol of all those elements thatmay influence the risk, a risk that within
nanotechnology represent an element hard to be identified. The role of
RECs within Nanotechnology s clinical trials may be, then, decisive in the
formulation of more specific operating procedures in this field.
KW - Clinical trials
KW - Nanomedicine
KW - Nanotechnology
KW - Research ethics committees (RECs)
KW - Clinical trials
KW - Nanomedicine
KW - Nanotechnology
KW - Research ethics committees (RECs)
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/40640
UR - http://www.tsijournals.com/nsnt/vol7_1/abs04.htm
M3 - Article
SN - 0974-7494
VL - 7
SP - 19
EP - 22
JO - NANO SCIENCE & NANO TECHNOLOGY: AN INDIAN JOURNAL
JF - NANO SCIENCE & NANO TECHNOLOGY: AN INDIAN JOURNAL
ER -