Clinical impact of pulmonary sampling site in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A prospective study using bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage

PURPOSE: \r\n\r\nIt is unclear whether ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is actually a bilateral and multifocal process. In addition, the diagnostic role of chest x-ray is under debate. Assuming a low microbiologic concordance between the left and right lungs, the reliability of a single pulmonary sampling becomes questionable. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the choice of the pulmonary sampling area is clinically relevant in the management of VAP.\r\n\r\nMETHODS: \r\n\r\nIn 79 patients admitted to a university general intensive care unit with clinically suspected VAP, right- and left-lung bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples were taken with separate bronchoscopes and quantitatively cultured. Primary end-point variable was microbiologic concordance rate between right- and left-lung BAL cultures. Secondary outcomes included predictors of microbiologic concordance, rates of appropriate antibiotic treatment, and diagnostic accuracy of chest x-ray.\r\n\r\nRESULTS: \r\n\r\nBAL cultures were bilaterally negative in 21 (27%) of 79 patients, bilaterally positive in 36 (46%), and unilaterally positive (right in 12, left in 10) in 22 (28%). Intra-patient concordance was observed in 47 (59.5%) of 79 cases and independently associated with purulent secretions and bilateral infiltrates on chest x-ray. In simulated prescribing experiments, treatments chosen based on right or left cultures alone were as appropriate as those based on bilateral data in >90% of cases. The presence of a radiographic infiltrate in the sampling area predicted BAL culture positivity with a positive predictive value of only 61%.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS: \r\n\r\nIn patients with clinically suspected VAP (especially those without purulent secretions or without radiographically documented bilateral infiltrates), quantitative culture of a single BAL sample may provide an incomplete assessment of lung microbiology, without having a relevant impact on the appropriateness of antimicrobial treatment. These findings suggest that single sampling of respiratory secretions, regardless radiographic opacity, seems to be a reliable diagnostic method in the management of VAP