Abstract
Ethical implications of neuroenhacement are discussed. In particular, possible advantages the participants of a research study can benefit from are taken into account. Even though the study is aimed at empowering participants' skills in a given domain, the researchers have to pay attention to the effects that the intervention can produce on self-conceptions, since the belief that improvements are generated only by external factors rather than personal engagement might be indirectly elicited.
| Titolo tradotto del contributo | [Autom. eng. transl.] Who decides what is best for research subjects? [Who decides what is better for the participants involved in a research study?] |
|---|---|
| Lingua originale | Italian |
| pagine (da-a) | 267-269 |
| Numero di pagine | 3 |
| Rivista | Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo |
| Volume | 25 |
| Numero di pubblicazione | 2 |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2021 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Psicologia dello Sviluppo e dell’Educazione
- Psicologia Clinica
Keywords
- Enhancement
- Neuroenhancement
- Transcranic electrical stimulation (tES)
- Vulnerability