Chi decide che cosa è meglio per i soggetti della ricerca? [Who decides what is better for the participants involved in a research study?]

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

Abstract

Ethical implications of neuroenhacement are discussed. In particular, possible advantages the participants of a research study can benefit from are taken into account. Even though the study is aimed at empowering participants' skills in a given domain, the researchers have to pay attention to the effects that the intervention can produce on self-conceptions, since the belief that improvements are generated only by external factors rather than personal engagement might be indirectly elicited.
Titolo tradotto del contributo[Autom. eng. transl.] Who decides what is best for research subjects? [Who decides what is better for the participants involved in a research study?]
Lingua originaleItalian
pagine (da-a)267-269
Numero di pagine3
RivistaPsicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo
Volume25
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2021

Keywords

  • Enhancement
  • Neuroenhancement
  • Transcranic electrical stimulation (tES)
  • Vulnerability

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Chi decide che cosa è meglio per i soggetti della ricerca? [Who decides what is better for the participants involved in a research study?]'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo