TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges in internet addiction disorder: Is a diagnosis feasible or not?
AU - Musetti, Alessandro
AU - Cattivelli, Roberto
AU - Giacobbi, Marco
AU - Zuglian, Pablo
AU - Ceccarini, Martina
AU - Capelli, Francesca
AU - Pietrabissa, Giada
AU - Castelnuovo, Gianluca
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - An important international discussion began because of some pioneer studies carried out by Young (1996a) on the internet addiction disorder (IAD). In the fifth and most recent version of the Diagnostic, and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) there is no mention of this disorder and among researchers there are basically two opposite positions. Those who are in favor of a specific diagnosis and those who are claiming the importance of specific criteria characterizing this behavior and the precise role it has in the patient's life. The aim of the present paper is to answer the question whether it is possible or not to formulate diagnoses of internet-related disorders. We revised literature on the history of diagnostic criteria, on neurocognitive evidence, on the topic debate and on IAD instrumental measures. We found that the disorder was not univocally defined and that the construct was somehow too broad and generic to be explicative for a diagnosis. Indeed, the models are borrowed from other addiction pathologies and they are often formulated before the development of internet as intended in current society. In conclusion, we think we need a more innovative, integrated and comprehensive model for an IAD diagnosis.
AB - An important international discussion began because of some pioneer studies carried out by Young (1996a) on the internet addiction disorder (IAD). In the fifth and most recent version of the Diagnostic, and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) there is no mention of this disorder and among researchers there are basically two opposite positions. Those who are in favor of a specific diagnosis and those who are claiming the importance of specific criteria characterizing this behavior and the precise role it has in the patient's life. The aim of the present paper is to answer the question whether it is possible or not to formulate diagnoses of internet-related disorders. We revised literature on the history of diagnostic criteria, on neurocognitive evidence, on the topic debate and on IAD instrumental measures. We found that the disorder was not univocally defined and that the construct was somehow too broad and generic to be explicative for a diagnosis. Indeed, the models are borrowed from other addiction pathologies and they are often formulated before the development of internet as intended in current society. In conclusion, we think we need a more innovative, integrated and comprehensive model for an IAD diagnosis.
KW - Addiction
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Internet addiction disorder
KW - Internet-related psychopathology
KW - Psychology (all)
KW - Addiction
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Internet addiction disorder
KW - Internet-related psychopathology
KW - Psychology (all)
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/100878
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84980043580&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84980043580&origin=inward
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00842
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00842
M3 - Article
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 7
SP - 842
EP - 849
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
IS - JUN
ER -