TY - JOUR
T1 - Central nervous system pediatric multi-disciplinary tumor board: a single center experience
AU - Russo, Rosellina
AU - Verdolotti, Tommaso
AU - Perna, Alessandro
AU - Ruscelli, Luigi
AU - D'Abronzo, Rosa
AU - Romano, Alberto
AU - Ferrara, Giuseppe
AU - Parisi, Davide
AU - Infante, Amato
AU - Chiesa, Silvia
AU - Massimi, Luca
AU - Tamburrini, Gianpiero
AU - Ruggiero, Antonio
AU - Gessi, Marco
AU - Martucci, Matia
AU - Gaudino, Simona
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: The Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) is a collaborative platform involving specialists in oncology, surgery, radiology, pathology, and radiotherapy, and aims to optimize diagnostics and treatments. Despite MTB’s widespread benefits, limited literature addresses its application in pediatric neuro-oncology. After a literature revision on pediatric neuro-oncology MTB, our study describes our institute’s pediatric neuro-oncology MTB, focuses on evaluating its impact and the neuroradiologist’s role in patient-centric approaches, considering recent genetic insights into pediatric brain tumors. Materials and methods: Literature Review concerning pediatric neuro-oncology MTB from January 2002 to June 2024. Clinical Data: retrospective study of all patient files presented in the pediatric neuro-oncology MTB (pnMTB) between 2019 and 2022. Statistical analysis was mainly carried out by directly comparing the absolute or relative values of the respective parameters examined; qualitative variables compared mainly with the chi-square test, quantitative variables mainly with the t-test. Results: Literature Review: 7 papers encompass a multidisciplinary approach for the pediatric CNS tumors. Clinical data: A total of 236 discussions were analyzed representing 107 patients. Median age was 14,3 years (range: 6 months – 17 years). The requests for case evaluations primarily came from the pediatric oncologists (83%) and neurosurgeons (14.8%), and they were mainly addressed to the neuroradiologists (70.3%). Proposals during pnMTB mainly involved imaging follow-up (47.8%) and management with chemotherapy (34.7%). Changes in patient treatment (CPT) occurred in 115 cases, and pediatric neuroradiologist intervention contributed to 72.4% of these changes. Conclusion: Thanks to their multidisciplinarity, high number of cases discussed, and usual respect for their proposals, the pnMTB has made it possible to improve the coordination among specialties involved in patient management, to apply the recent protocols, and to exchange knowledge among teams managing pediatric CNS tumors.
AB - Background: The Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) is a collaborative platform involving specialists in oncology, surgery, radiology, pathology, and radiotherapy, and aims to optimize diagnostics and treatments. Despite MTB’s widespread benefits, limited literature addresses its application in pediatric neuro-oncology. After a literature revision on pediatric neuro-oncology MTB, our study describes our institute’s pediatric neuro-oncology MTB, focuses on evaluating its impact and the neuroradiologist’s role in patient-centric approaches, considering recent genetic insights into pediatric brain tumors. Materials and methods: Literature Review concerning pediatric neuro-oncology MTB from January 2002 to June 2024. Clinical Data: retrospective study of all patient files presented in the pediatric neuro-oncology MTB (pnMTB) between 2019 and 2022. Statistical analysis was mainly carried out by directly comparing the absolute or relative values of the respective parameters examined; qualitative variables compared mainly with the chi-square test, quantitative variables mainly with the t-test. Results: Literature Review: 7 papers encompass a multidisciplinary approach for the pediatric CNS tumors. Clinical data: A total of 236 discussions were analyzed representing 107 patients. Median age was 14,3 years (range: 6 months – 17 years). The requests for case evaluations primarily came from the pediatric oncologists (83%) and neurosurgeons (14.8%), and they were mainly addressed to the neuroradiologists (70.3%). Proposals during pnMTB mainly involved imaging follow-up (47.8%) and management with chemotherapy (34.7%). Changes in patient treatment (CPT) occurred in 115 cases, and pediatric neuroradiologist intervention contributed to 72.4% of these changes. Conclusion: Thanks to their multidisciplinarity, high number of cases discussed, and usual respect for their proposals, the pnMTB has made it possible to improve the coordination among specialties involved in patient management, to apply the recent protocols, and to exchange knowledge among teams managing pediatric CNS tumors.
KW - MRI
KW - Multidisciplinary tumor board
KW - Neuro-oncology
KW - Neuroradiology
KW - Pediatric
KW - brain tumors
KW - MRI
KW - Multidisciplinary tumor board
KW - Neuro-oncology
KW - Neuroradiology
KW - Pediatric
KW - brain tumors
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/313824
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85204137603&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85204137603&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1186/s12885-024-12882-7
DO - 10.1186/s12885-024-12882-7
M3 - Article
SN - 1471-2407
VL - 24
SP - N/A-N/A
JO - BMC Cancer
JF - BMC Cancer
IS - 1
ER -