Abstract
This paper attempts to identify behavioral patterns and compare their average success considering several criteria of bounded rationality. Experimentally observed choice behavior in various decision tasks is used to assess heterogeneity in how individual participants respond to 15 randomly ordered portfolio choices, each of which is experienced twice. Treatments differ in (not) granting probability information and in (not) eliciting aspirations. Since in our setting neither other regarding concerns nor risk attitude matter and probability of the binary chance move is (optimal) choice irrelevant, categorizing decision types relies on parameter dependence and choice adaptations. We find that most participants reduce systematically sub-optimality when following the identified criteria.
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 151-177 |
| Numero di pagine | 27 |
| Rivista | Theory and Decision |
| Volume | 85 |
| Numero di pubblicazione | 2 |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2018 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Scienze delle Decisioni Generali
- Psicologia dello Sviluppo e dell’Educazione
- Discipline Umanistiche (varie)
- Psicologia Applicata
- Scienze Sociali Generali
- Economia, Econometria e Finanza Generali
- Informatica Applicata
Keywords
- (Un)bounded rationality
- Experiments
- Heterogeneity
- Satisficing