Abstract
The aim of this paper is to introduce a system of dynamic deontic logic in which the
main problems related to the denition of deontic concepts, especially those emerging
from a standard analysis of permission in terms of possibility of doing an action
without incurring in a violation of the law, are solved. The basic idea is to introduce
two crucial distinctions allowing us to dierentiate (i) what is ideal with respect to a
given code, which xes the types of action that are abstractly prescribed, and what
is ideal with respect to the specic situation in which the agent acts, and (ii) the
transitions associated with actions and the results of actions, which can obtain even
without the action being performed.
| Lingua originale | English |
|---|---|
| Titolo della pubblicazione ospite | Deontic Logic and Normative Systems |
| Editor | Allard Tamminga, Malte Willer Olivier Roy |
| Pagine | 80-92 |
| Numero di pagine | 13 |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2016 |
Keywords
- deontic paradoxes
- dynamic deontic logic
- ought-to-be logic
- ought-to-do logic