Balancing Donor and Recipient Risk Factors in Liver Transplantation: The Value of D-MELD With Particular Reference to HCV Recipients

  • Alfonso Wolfango Avolio*
  • , U Cillo
  • , M Salizzoni
  • , L De Carlis
  • , M Colledan
  • , GE Gerunda
  • , V Mazzaferro
  • , G Tisone
  • , R Romagnoli
  • , L Caccamo
  • , M Rossi
  • , A Vitale
  • , A Cucchetti
  • , L Lupo
  • , S Gruttadauria
  • , N Nicolotti
  • , P Burra
  • , Antonio Gasbarrini
  • , Salvatore Agnes
  • , MC Lirosi
  • Luca Miele, Maurizio Pompili, M Siciliano, V Perilli, Rita Gaspari, M Castagneto, F Tandoi, I Mangoni, L Belli, AD Pinna, M Cescon, B Gridelli, S Li Petri, R Volpes, D Pinelli, S Fagiuoli, R Montalti, E Regalia, G Rossi, B Antonelli, P Berloco, Q Lai, A Risaliti, D Nicolini, U Valente, M Gelli, N Morelli, F Zamboni, Vincenzo Tondolo, GM Ettorre, G Vennarecci, F Bresadola, U Baccarani, PL Toniutto, T Manzia, A Anselmo, M Angelico, F Calise, V Scuderi, M Romano, L Lupo, M Rendina, M Barone, O Cuomo, A Perrella, W Santaniello, M Donataccio, G Dalle Ore, J de Ville de Goyet, L Monti, C de Waure
*Autore corrispondente per questo lavoro

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo

Abstract

Donorrecipient match is a matter of debate in liver transplantation. D-MELD (donor age x recipient biochemical model for end-stage liver disease [MELD]) and other factors were analyzed on a national Italian database recording 5946 liver transplants. Primary endpoint was to determine factors predictive of 3-year patient survival. D-MELD cutoff predictive of 5-year patient survival <50% (5yrsPS<50%) was investigated. A prognosis calculator was implemented (). Differences among D-MELD deciles allowed their regrouping into three D-MELD classes (A < 338, B 338-1628, C >1628). At 3 years, the odds ratio (OR) for death was 2.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.442.85) in D-MELD class C versus B. The OR was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.24-0.66) in class A versus class B. Other predictors were hepatitis C virus (HCV; OR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.11-1.81), hepatitis B virus (HBV; OR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.93), retransplant (OR = 1.82; 95% CI, 1.16-2.87) and low-volume center (OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.1-11.99). Cox regressions up to 90 months confirmed results. The hazard ratio was 1.97 (95% CI, 1.592.43) for D-MELD class C versus class B and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.290.60) for D-MELD class A versus class B. Recipient age, HCV, HBV and retransplant were also significant. The 5yrsPS<50% cutoff was identified only in HCV patients (D-MELD = 1750). The innovative approach offered by D-MELD and covariates is helpful in predicting outcome after liver transplantation, especially in HCV recipients.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)2724-2736
Numero di pagine13
RivistaAmerican Journal of Transplantation
Volume11
Numero di pubblicazione12
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2011

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Immunologia e Allergia
  • Trapianto
  • Farmacologia (medica)

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • D-MELD
  • Donor Selection
  • End Stage Liver Disease
  • Female
  • Graft Rejection
  • Graft Survival
  • Health Status Indicators
  • Hepacivirus
  • Hepatitis C
  • Humans
  • Italy
  • Liver Transplantation
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Statistical
  • Survival Rate
  • Tissue Donors
  • Young Adult
  • donor-recipient match
  • liver transplantation
  • outcome
  • prognosis
  • risk factors

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Balancing Donor and Recipient Risk Factors in Liver Transplantation: The Value of D-MELD With Particular Reference to HCV Recipients'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo