Austerity and Financialization: Is There Another Way? The Pasinetti Suggestion

Lorenzo Esposito*, joseph halevi

*Autore corrispondente per questo lavoro

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

Since the 1990s, economic policies in Europe and elsewhere, have been based on the theoretical and practical ideas embedded in the Maastricht Treaty: public debt and deficit must be reduced, even if this implies severe austerity. The main goal of this policy, growth with a decrease in public debt, did not work. Although the Maastricht Treaty framework received a wide consensus in the academic world as well in European politics, a few brave scholars stood up since the beginning to show its fallacies. In this article, we will discuss the critiques that Pasinetti made to the set-up of the EU economic policy, then we will connect the fate of public and private debt and finally we will explain why continuing with austerity will condemn Europe to anemic growth and political irrelevance.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)252-261
Numero di pagine10
RivistaInternational Journal of Political Economy
Volume53
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2024
Pubblicato esternamente

Keywords

  • Pasinetti
  • austerity
  • fiscal policy
  • Trattato di Maastricht
  • austerità
  • politica fiscale
  • Maastricht Treaty

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Austerity and Financialization: Is There Another Way? The Pasinetti Suggestion'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo