TY - JOUR
T1 - Attitudes Towards Procreative Options in the Event of Infertility: The Role of Personal Values and Religiosity
AU - Canzi, Elena Camilla Rosa
AU - Danioni, Francesca Vittoria
AU - Rosnati, Rosa
AU - Scabini, Eugenia
AU - Barni, Daniela
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background:
Literature regarding attitudes towards procreative options in the event of infertility is highly limited.
Objective:
The general aim of the current cross-sectional study is to analyze the relation between basic, personal values (self-enhancement and self- transcendence), and procreative options (living without children, adoption, homologous techniques, and heterologous techniques), while exploring
the role of religiosity in moderating this relation.
Methods:
A large sample of 1,891 young Italian adults aged between 18 and 33 was used in the study. The participants were asked to complete a self-report questionnaire. A series of hierarchical regression models were constructed using the SPSS 24.0 software, in order to test the moderation hypotheses.
Results:
Self-enhancement values were positively related to the choice of both homologous and heterologous techniques, whereas self-transcendence values were strong and positive predictors of adoption. Moreover, a significant moderating role of religiosity in shaping the relations between personal values and attitudes towards heterologous techniques emerged: at low levels of self-enhancement values, highly religious participants had a more negative attitude towards heterologous techniques compared to participants with low religiosity. However, self-transcendence values predicted a more positive attitude towards heterologous techniques among participants with low religiosity.
Conclusion:
Findings showed the link between personal values and attitudes towards assisted reproductive techniques and adoption, along with the role of religiosity in shaping this relation; heterologous techniques were the most controversial option according to participants’ perceptions.
AB - Background:
Literature regarding attitudes towards procreative options in the event of infertility is highly limited.
Objective:
The general aim of the current cross-sectional study is to analyze the relation between basic, personal values (self-enhancement and self- transcendence), and procreative options (living without children, adoption, homologous techniques, and heterologous techniques), while exploring
the role of religiosity in moderating this relation.
Methods:
A large sample of 1,891 young Italian adults aged between 18 and 33 was used in the study. The participants were asked to complete a self-report questionnaire. A series of hierarchical regression models were constructed using the SPSS 24.0 software, in order to test the moderation hypotheses.
Results:
Self-enhancement values were positively related to the choice of both homologous and heterologous techniques, whereas self-transcendence values were strong and positive predictors of adoption. Moreover, a significant moderating role of religiosity in shaping the relations between personal values and attitudes towards heterologous techniques emerged: at low levels of self-enhancement values, highly religious participants had a more negative attitude towards heterologous techniques compared to participants with low religiosity. However, self-transcendence values predicted a more positive attitude towards heterologous techniques among participants with low religiosity.
Conclusion:
Findings showed the link between personal values and attitudes towards assisted reproductive techniques and adoption, along with the role of religiosity in shaping this relation; heterologous techniques were the most controversial option according to participants’ perceptions.
KW - Adoption
KW - Assisted reproductive techniques
KW - Infertility
KW - Personal values
KW - Procreative options
KW - Religious beliefs
KW - Adoption
KW - Assisted reproductive techniques
KW - Infertility
KW - Personal values
KW - Procreative options
KW - Religious beliefs
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/175366
U2 - 10.2174/1874350102013010341
DO - 10.2174/1874350102013010341
M3 - Article
SN - 1874-3501
VL - 13
SP - 341
EP - 350
JO - THE OPEN PSYCHOLOGY JOURNAL
JF - THE OPEN PSYCHOLOGY JOURNAL
ER -