TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of Delayed Surgery with Oncologic Long-term Outcomes in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Not Responding to Preoperative Chemoradiation
AU - Deidda, Simona
AU - Elmore, Ugo
AU - Rosati, Riccardo
AU - De Nardi, Paola
AU - Vignali, Andrea
AU - Puccetti, Francesco
AU - Spolverato, Gaya
AU - Capelli, Giulia
AU - Zuin, Matteo
AU - Muratore, Andrea
AU - Danna, Riccardo
AU - Calabrò, Marcello
AU - Guerrieri, Mario
AU - Ortenzi, Monica
AU - Ghiselli, Roberto
AU - Scabini, Stefano
AU - Aprile, Alessandra
AU - Pertile, Davide
AU - Sammarco, Giuseppe
AU - Gallo, Gaetano
AU - Sena, Giuseppe
AU - Coco, Claudio
AU - Rizzo, Gianluca
AU - Pafundi, Donato Paolo
AU - Belluco, Claudio
AU - Innocente, Roberto
AU - Degiuli, Maurizio
AU - Reddavid, Rossella
AU - Puca, Lucia
AU - Delrio, Paolo
AU - Rega, Daniela
AU - Conti, Pietro
AU - Pastorino, Alessandro
AU - Zorcolo, Luigi
AU - Pucciarelli, Salvatore
AU - Aschele, Carlo
AU - Restivo, Angelo
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Importance: Extending the interval between the end of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery may enhance tumor response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, data on the association of delaying surgery with long-term outcome in patients who had a minor or poor response are lacking. Objective: To assess a large series of patients who had minor or no tumor response to CRT and the association of shorter or longer waiting times between CRT and surgery with short- and long-term outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data from 1701 consecutive patients with rectal cancer treated in 12 Italian referral centers were analyzed for colorectal surgery between January 2000 and December 2014. Patients with a minor or null tumor response (ypT stage of 2 to 3 or ypN positive) stage greater than 0 to neoadjuvant CRT were selected for the study. The data were analyzed between March and July 2020. Exposures: Patients who had a minor or null tumor response were divided into 2 groups according to the wait time between neoadjuvant therapy end and surgery. Differences in surgical and oncological outcomes between these 2 groups were explored. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were overall and disease-free survival between the 2 groups. Results: Of a total of 1064 patients, 654 (61.5%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 64 (55-71) years. A total of 579 patients (54.4%) had a shorter wait time (8 weeks or less) 485 patients (45.6%) had a longer wait time (greater than 8 weeks). A longer waiting time before surgery was associated with worse 5- and 10-year overall survival rates (67.6% [95% CI, 63.1%-71.7%] vs 80.3% [95% CI, 76.5%-83.6%] at 5 years; 40.1% [95% CI, 33.5%-46.5%] vs 57.8% [95% CI, 52.1%-63.0%] at 10 years; P <.001). Also, delayed surgery was associated with worse 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (59.6% [95% CI, 54.9%-63.9%] vs 72.0% [95% CI, 67.9%-75.7%] at 5 years; 36.2% [95% CI, 29.9%-42.4%] vs 53.9% [95% CI, 48.5%-59.1%] at 10 years; P <.001). At multivariate analysis, a longer waiting time was associated with an augmented risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.50-2.26; P <.001) and death/recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.39-2.04; P <.001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, a longer interval before surgery after completing neoadjuvant CRT was associated with worse overall and disease-free survival in tumors with a poor pathological response to preoperative CRT. Based on these findings, patients who do not respond well to CRT should be identified early after the end of CRT and undergo surgery without delay..
AB - Importance: Extending the interval between the end of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery may enhance tumor response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, data on the association of delaying surgery with long-term outcome in patients who had a minor or poor response are lacking. Objective: To assess a large series of patients who had minor or no tumor response to CRT and the association of shorter or longer waiting times between CRT and surgery with short- and long-term outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data from 1701 consecutive patients with rectal cancer treated in 12 Italian referral centers were analyzed for colorectal surgery between January 2000 and December 2014. Patients with a minor or null tumor response (ypT stage of 2 to 3 or ypN positive) stage greater than 0 to neoadjuvant CRT were selected for the study. The data were analyzed between March and July 2020. Exposures: Patients who had a minor or null tumor response were divided into 2 groups according to the wait time between neoadjuvant therapy end and surgery. Differences in surgical and oncological outcomes between these 2 groups were explored. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were overall and disease-free survival between the 2 groups. Results: Of a total of 1064 patients, 654 (61.5%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 64 (55-71) years. A total of 579 patients (54.4%) had a shorter wait time (8 weeks or less) 485 patients (45.6%) had a longer wait time (greater than 8 weeks). A longer waiting time before surgery was associated with worse 5- and 10-year overall survival rates (67.6% [95% CI, 63.1%-71.7%] vs 80.3% [95% CI, 76.5%-83.6%] at 5 years; 40.1% [95% CI, 33.5%-46.5%] vs 57.8% [95% CI, 52.1%-63.0%] at 10 years; P <.001). Also, delayed surgery was associated with worse 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (59.6% [95% CI, 54.9%-63.9%] vs 72.0% [95% CI, 67.9%-75.7%] at 5 years; 36.2% [95% CI, 29.9%-42.4%] vs 53.9% [95% CI, 48.5%-59.1%] at 10 years; P <.001). At multivariate analysis, a longer waiting time was associated with an augmented risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.50-2.26; P <.001) and death/recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.39-2.04; P <.001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, a longer interval before surgery after completing neoadjuvant CRT was associated with worse overall and disease-free survival in tumors with a poor pathological response to preoperative CRT. Based on these findings, patients who do not respond well to CRT should be identified early after the end of CRT and undergo surgery without delay..
KW - Rectal Cancer
KW - Rectal Cancer
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/298236
U2 - 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4566
DO - 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4566
M3 - Article
SN - 2168-6254
VL - 156
SP - 1141
EP - 1149
JO - JAMA Surgery
JF - JAMA Surgery
ER -