TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of Muscle Function and Physical Performance in Daily Clinical Practice: A position paper endorsed by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO)
AU - Beaudart, Charlotte
AU - Rolland, Yves
AU - Cruz-Jentoft, Alfonso J.
AU - Bauer, Jürgen M.
AU - Sieber, Cornel
AU - Cooper, Cyrus
AU - Al-Daghri, Nasser
AU - Araujo De Carvalho, Islene
AU - Bautmans, Ivan
AU - Bernabei, Roberto
AU - Bruyère, Olivier
AU - Cesari, Matteo
AU - Cherubini, Antonio
AU - Dawson-Hughes, Bess
AU - Kanis, John A.
AU - Kaufman, Jean-Marc
AU - Landi, Francesco
AU - Maggi, Stefania
AU - Mccloskey, Eugene
AU - Petermans, Jean
AU - Rodriguez Mañas, Leocadio
AU - Reginster, Jean-Yves
AU - Roller-Wirnsberger, Regina
AU - Schaap, Laura A.
AU - Uebelhart, Daniel
AU - Rizzoli, René
AU - Fielding, Roger A.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - It is well recognized that poor muscle function and poor physical performance are strong predictors of clinically relevant adverse events in older people. Given the large number of approaches to measure muscle function and physical performance, clinicians often struggle to choose a tool that is appropriate and validated for the population of older people they deal with. In this paper, an overview of different methods available and applicable in clinical settings is proposed. This paper is based on literature reviews performed by members of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) working group on frailty and sarcopenia. Face-to-face meetings were organized afterwards where the whole group could amend and discuss the recommendations further. Several characteristics should be considered when choosing a tool: (1) purpose of the assessment (intervention, screening, diagnosis); (2) patient characteristics (population, settings, functional ability, etc.); (3) psychometric properties of the tool (test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, etc.); (4) applicability of the tool in clinical settings (overall cost, time required for the examination, level of training, equipment, patient acceptance, etc.); (5) prognostic reliability for relevant clinical outcomes. Based on these criteria and the available evidence, the expert group advises the use of grip strength to measure muscle strength and the use of 4-m gait speed or the Short Physical Performance Battery test to measure physical performance in daily practice. The tools proposed are relevant for the assessment of muscle weakness and physical performance. Subjects with low values should receive additional diagnostic workups to achieve a full diagnosis of the underlying condition responsible (sarcopenia, frailty or other).
AB - It is well recognized that poor muscle function and poor physical performance are strong predictors of clinically relevant adverse events in older people. Given the large number of approaches to measure muscle function and physical performance, clinicians often struggle to choose a tool that is appropriate and validated for the population of older people they deal with. In this paper, an overview of different methods available and applicable in clinical settings is proposed. This paper is based on literature reviews performed by members of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) working group on frailty and sarcopenia. Face-to-face meetings were organized afterwards where the whole group could amend and discuss the recommendations further. Several characteristics should be considered when choosing a tool: (1) purpose of the assessment (intervention, screening, diagnosis); (2) patient characteristics (population, settings, functional ability, etc.); (3) psychometric properties of the tool (test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, etc.); (4) applicability of the tool in clinical settings (overall cost, time required for the examination, level of training, equipment, patient acceptance, etc.); (5) prognostic reliability for relevant clinical outcomes. Based on these criteria and the available evidence, the expert group advises the use of grip strength to measure muscle strength and the use of 4-m gait speed or the Short Physical Performance Battery test to measure physical performance in daily practice. The tools proposed are relevant for the assessment of muscle weakness and physical performance. Subjects with low values should receive additional diagnostic workups to achieve a full diagnosis of the underlying condition responsible (sarcopenia, frailty or other).
KW - Daily practice
KW - Muscle function
KW - Muscle strenght
KW - Physical performance
KW - Sarcopenia
KW - Daily practice
KW - Muscle function
KW - Muscle strenght
KW - Physical performance
KW - Sarcopenia
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/148315
U2 - 10.1007/s00223-019-00545-w
DO - 10.1007/s00223-019-00545-w
M3 - Article
SN - 0171-967X
VL - 105
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Calcified Tissue International
JF - Calcified Tissue International
ER -