TY - JOUR
T1 - Ascites and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibition in dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal and gastric cancers
AU - Fucà, Giovanni
AU - Cohen, Romain
AU - Lonardi, Sara
AU - Shitara, Kohei
AU - Elez, Maria Elena
AU - Fakih, Marwan
AU - Chao, Joseph
AU - Klempner, Samuel J
AU - Emmett, Matthew
AU - Jayachandran, Priya
AU - Bergamo, Francesca
AU - Garciá, Marc Diéz
AU - Mazzoli, Giacomo
AU - Provenzano, Leonardo
AU - Colle, Raphael
AU - Svrcek, Magali
AU - Ambrosini, Margherita
AU - Randon, Giovanni
AU - Shah, Aakash Tushar
AU - Salati, Massimiliano
AU - Fenocchio, Elisabetta
AU - Salvatore, Lisa
AU - Chida, Keigo
AU - Kawazoe, Akihito
AU - Conca, Veronica
AU - Curigliano, Giuseppe
AU - Corti, Francesca
AU - Cremolini, Chiara
AU - Overman, Michael
AU - Andre, Thierry
AU - Pietrantonio, Filippo
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background Despite unprecedented benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) advanced gastrointestinal cancers, a relevant proportion of patients shows primary resistance or short-term disease control. Since malignant effusions represent an immune-suppressed niche, we investigated whether peritoneal involvement with or without ascites is a poor prognostic factor in patients with dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and gastric cancer (mGC) receiving ICIs. Methods We conducted a global multicohort study at Tertiary Cancer Centers and collected clinic-pathological data from a cohort of patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC treated with anti-PD-(L)1 ±anti-CTLA-4 agents at 12 institutions (developing set). A cohort of patients with dMMR/MSI-high mGC treated with anti-PD-1 agents±chemotherapy at five institutions was used as validating dataset. Results The mCRC cohort included 502 patients. After a median follow-up of 31.2 months, patients without peritoneal metastases and those with peritoneal metastases and no ascites had similar outcomes (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.15, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.56 for progression-free survival (PFS); aHR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.42 for overall survival (OS)), whereas inferior outcomes were observed in patients with peritoneal metastases and ascites (aHR 2.90, 95% CI 1.70 to 4.94; aHR 3.33, 95% CI 1.88 to 5.91) compared with patients without peritoneal involvement. The mGC cohort included 59 patients. After a median follow-up of 17.4 months, inferior PFS and OS were reported in patients with peritoneal metastases and ascites (aHR 3.83, 95% CI 1.68 to 8.72; aHR 3.44, 95% CI 1.39 to 8.53, respectively), but not in patients with only peritoneal metastases (aHR 1.87, 95% CI 0.64 to 5.46; aHR 2.15, 95% CI 0.64 to 7.27) when compared with patients without peritoneal involvement. Conclusions Patients with dMMR/MSI-H gastrointestinal cancers with peritoneal metastases and ascites should be considered as a peculiar subgroup with highly unfavorable outcomes to current ICI-based therapies. Novel strategies to target the immune-suppressive niche in malignant effusions should be investigated, as well as next-generation ICIs or intraperitoneal approaches.
AB - Background Despite unprecedented benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) advanced gastrointestinal cancers, a relevant proportion of patients shows primary resistance or short-term disease control. Since malignant effusions represent an immune-suppressed niche, we investigated whether peritoneal involvement with or without ascites is a poor prognostic factor in patients with dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and gastric cancer (mGC) receiving ICIs. Methods We conducted a global multicohort study at Tertiary Cancer Centers and collected clinic-pathological data from a cohort of patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC treated with anti-PD-(L)1 ±anti-CTLA-4 agents at 12 institutions (developing set). A cohort of patients with dMMR/MSI-high mGC treated with anti-PD-1 agents±chemotherapy at five institutions was used as validating dataset. Results The mCRC cohort included 502 patients. After a median follow-up of 31.2 months, patients without peritoneal metastases and those with peritoneal metastases and no ascites had similar outcomes (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.15, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.56 for progression-free survival (PFS); aHR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.42 for overall survival (OS)), whereas inferior outcomes were observed in patients with peritoneal metastases and ascites (aHR 2.90, 95% CI 1.70 to 4.94; aHR 3.33, 95% CI 1.88 to 5.91) compared with patients without peritoneal involvement. The mGC cohort included 59 patients. After a median follow-up of 17.4 months, inferior PFS and OS were reported in patients with peritoneal metastases and ascites (aHR 3.83, 95% CI 1.68 to 8.72; aHR 3.44, 95% CI 1.39 to 8.53, respectively), but not in patients with only peritoneal metastases (aHR 1.87, 95% CI 0.64 to 5.46; aHR 2.15, 95% CI 0.64 to 7.27) when compared with patients without peritoneal involvement. Conclusions Patients with dMMR/MSI-H gastrointestinal cancers with peritoneal metastases and ascites should be considered as a peculiar subgroup with highly unfavorable outcomes to current ICI-based therapies. Novel strategies to target the immune-suppressive niche in malignant effusions should be investigated, as well as next-generation ICIs or intraperitoneal approaches.
KW - Aged
KW - Ascites
KW - Colorectal Neoplasms
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
KW - Male
KW - Microsatellite Instability
KW - Neoplasm Metastasis
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Stomach Neoplasms
KW - Survival Analysis
KW - gastrointestinal neoplasms
KW - immunotherapy
KW - translational medical research
KW - tumor biomarkers
KW - Aged
KW - Ascites
KW - Colorectal Neoplasms
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
KW - Male
KW - Microsatellite Instability
KW - Neoplasm Metastasis
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Stomach Neoplasms
KW - Survival Analysis
KW - gastrointestinal neoplasms
KW - immunotherapy
KW - translational medical research
KW - tumor biomarkers
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/206336
U2 - 10.1136/jitc-2021-004001
DO - 10.1136/jitc-2021-004001
M3 - Article
SN - 2051-1426
VL - 10
SP - 1
EP - 13
JO - Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
JF - Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
ER -