TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial intelligence to predict individualized outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients: The SIBILLA project
AU - Caliandro, Pietro
AU - Lenkowicz, Jacopo
AU - Reale, Giuseppe
AU - Scaringi, Simone
AU - Zauli, Aurelia
AU - Uccheddu, Christian
AU - Fabiole-Nicoletto, Simone
AU - Patarnello, Stefano
AU - Damiani, Andrea
AU - Tagliaferri, Luca
AU - Valente, Iacopo
AU - Moci, Marco
AU - Monforte, Mauro
AU - Valentini, Vincenzo
AU - Calabresi, Paolo
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Introduction: Formulating reliable prognosis for ischemic stroke patients remains a challenging task. We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence model able to formulate in the first 24 h after stroke an individualized prognosis in terms of NIHSS. Patients and methods: Seven hundred ninety four acute ischemic stroke patients were divided into a training (597) and testing (197) cohort. Clinical and instrumental data were collected in the first 24 h. We evaluated the performance of four machine-learning models (Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine, XGBoost) in predicting NIHSS at discharge both in terms of variation between discharge and admission (regressor approach) and in terms of severity class namely NIHSS 0–5, 6–10, 11–20, >20 (classifier approach). We used Shapley Additive exPlanations values to weight features impact on predictions. Results: XGBoost emerged as the best performing model. The classifier and regressor approaches perform similarly in terms of accuracy (80% vs 75%) and f1-score (79% vs 77%) respectively. However, the regressor has higher precision (85% vs 68%) in predicting prognosis of very severe stroke patients (NIHSS > 20). NIHSS at admission and 24 hours, GCS at 24 hours, heart rate, acute ischemic lesion on CT-scan and TICI score were the most impacting features on the prediction. Discussion: Our approach, which employs an artificial intelligence based-tool, inherently able to continuously learn and improve its performance, could improve care pathway and support stroke physicians in the communication with patients and caregivers. Conclusion: XGBoost reliably predicts individualized outcome in terms of NIHSS at discharge in the first 24 hours after stroke.
AB - Introduction: Formulating reliable prognosis for ischemic stroke patients remains a challenging task. We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence model able to formulate in the first 24 h after stroke an individualized prognosis in terms of NIHSS. Patients and methods: Seven hundred ninety four acute ischemic stroke patients were divided into a training (597) and testing (197) cohort. Clinical and instrumental data were collected in the first 24 h. We evaluated the performance of four machine-learning models (Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine, XGBoost) in predicting NIHSS at discharge both in terms of variation between discharge and admission (regressor approach) and in terms of severity class namely NIHSS 0–5, 6–10, 11–20, >20 (classifier approach). We used Shapley Additive exPlanations values to weight features impact on predictions. Results: XGBoost emerged as the best performing model. The classifier and regressor approaches perform similarly in terms of accuracy (80% vs 75%) and f1-score (79% vs 77%) respectively. However, the regressor has higher precision (85% vs 68%) in predicting prognosis of very severe stroke patients (NIHSS > 20). NIHSS at admission and 24 hours, GCS at 24 hours, heart rate, acute ischemic lesion on CT-scan and TICI score were the most impacting features on the prediction. Discussion: Our approach, which employs an artificial intelligence based-tool, inherently able to continuously learn and improve its performance, could improve care pathway and support stroke physicians in the communication with patients and caregivers. Conclusion: XGBoost reliably predicts individualized outcome in terms of NIHSS at discharge in the first 24 hours after stroke.
KW - Prognosis
KW - acute ischemic stroke
KW - outcome prediction
KW - machine learning (ML)
KW - artificial intelligence (AI)
KW - Prognosis
KW - acute ischemic stroke
KW - outcome prediction
KW - machine learning (ML)
KW - artificial intelligence (AI)
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/302136
U2 - 10.1177/23969873241253366
DO - 10.1177/23969873241253366
M3 - Article
SN - 2396-9873
VL - 9
SP - 1053
EP - 1062
JO - European Stroke Journal
JF - European Stroke Journal
ER -