TY - JOUR
T1 - Are all mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancers created equal? A large, retrospective, tertiary center experience
AU - Capasso, Ilaria
AU - Perrone, Emanuele
AU - Duranti, Simona
AU - Giannarelli, Diana
AU - Nero, Camilla
AU - Lucci Cordisco, Emanuela
AU - Pomponi, Maria Grazia
AU - Remondini, Laura
AU - Piermattei, Alessia
AU - Valente, Michele
AU - Santoro, Angela
AU - Esposito, Giovanni
AU - Parisi, Giuseppe
AU - Giuliano, Maria Consiglia
AU - Corrado, Martina
AU - Scambia, Giovanni
AU - Fanfani, Francesco
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: One third of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) presents with mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). Of these, 70 % are caused by somatic hypermethylation of MLH1 promoter; the remaining cases are determined by Lynch syndrome or double somatic inactivation of MMR genes. Although associated with good-intermediate prognosis, heterogeneity in treatment response and survival has been reported among MMRd ECs. We aim to investigate differences in pathologic aggressiveness and event-free survival (EFS) among three MMRd EC subtypes, classified by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MLH1 methylation analysis. Methods: Subjects undergone surgical staging for EC were retrospectively included. IHC analysis was performed in all patients to assess MMR and p53 status. Methylation analysis was performed in MMRd patients with IHC-negative MLH1. The MMRd population was classified into: 1)MLH1-hypermethylated (MLH1-HyMet); 2)MLH1-unmethylated (MLH1-UnMet); 3)IHC-negative MSH2 and/or MSH6 or PMS2 alone (non-MLH1). Results: Of 1171 patients undergoing surgical staging and IHC assessment, 362 (30.9 %) were classified as MMRd and included in the analysis. Among these, 59.7 % (n = 216) were MLH1-HyMet, 11 % (n = 40) MLH1-UnMet, and 29.3 % (n = 106) non-MLH1. Compared to MLH1-UnMet and non-MLH1, MLH1-HyMet was associated with older age, higher BMI, larger tumor size, deeper myometrial invasion, substantial lymphovascular space invasion, lower frequency of early-stage and low-risk disease. EFS was similar when comparing the MMRd subtypes, even after adjusting for stage and tumor histology. However, a trend of MLH1-HyMet toward poorer prognosis can be observed, particularly in the advanced/metastatic setting. Conclusions: MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd ECs display more aggressive clinicopathologic features compared to the other MMRd subgroups. However, although a suggestive trend toward poorer EFS was observed in the hypermethylated subset, particularly in the advanced setting, no significant differences in prognosis were detected among the MMRd subtypes.
AB - Background: One third of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) presents with mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). Of these, 70 % are caused by somatic hypermethylation of MLH1 promoter; the remaining cases are determined by Lynch syndrome or double somatic inactivation of MMR genes. Although associated with good-intermediate prognosis, heterogeneity in treatment response and survival has been reported among MMRd ECs. We aim to investigate differences in pathologic aggressiveness and event-free survival (EFS) among three MMRd EC subtypes, classified by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MLH1 methylation analysis. Methods: Subjects undergone surgical staging for EC were retrospectively included. IHC analysis was performed in all patients to assess MMR and p53 status. Methylation analysis was performed in MMRd patients with IHC-negative MLH1. The MMRd population was classified into: 1)MLH1-hypermethylated (MLH1-HyMet); 2)MLH1-unmethylated (MLH1-UnMet); 3)IHC-negative MSH2 and/or MSH6 or PMS2 alone (non-MLH1). Results: Of 1171 patients undergoing surgical staging and IHC assessment, 362 (30.9 %) were classified as MMRd and included in the analysis. Among these, 59.7 % (n = 216) were MLH1-HyMet, 11 % (n = 40) MLH1-UnMet, and 29.3 % (n = 106) non-MLH1. Compared to MLH1-UnMet and non-MLH1, MLH1-HyMet was associated with older age, higher BMI, larger tumor size, deeper myometrial invasion, substantial lymphovascular space invasion, lower frequency of early-stage and low-risk disease. EFS was similar when comparing the MMRd subtypes, even after adjusting for stage and tumor histology. However, a trend of MLH1-HyMet toward poorer prognosis can be observed, particularly in the advanced/metastatic setting. Conclusions: MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd ECs display more aggressive clinicopathologic features compared to the other MMRd subgroups. However, although a suggestive trend toward poorer EFS was observed in the hypermethylated subset, particularly in the advanced setting, no significant differences in prognosis were detected among the MMRd subtypes.
KW - Endometrial cancer
KW - Immunohistochemistry
KW - Methylation
KW - Mismatch repair deficiency
KW - Molecular classification
KW - Survival
KW - Endometrial cancer
KW - Immunohistochemistry
KW - Methylation
KW - Mismatch repair deficiency
KW - Molecular classification
KW - Survival
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/313132
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=86000326177&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=86000326177&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115344
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115344
M3 - Article
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 220
SP - N/A-N/A
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
IS - n/a
ER -