Anonymity and live-donor transplantation: an ELPAT view

Franco Citterio, Nizam Mamode, Annette Lennerling, Emma Massey, Kristof Van Assche, Sigrid Sterckx, Mihaela Frunza, Harald Jung, Assya Pascalev, Willij Zuidema, Rachel Johnson, Charlotte Loven, Willem Weimar, Frank Dor

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

13 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

Anonymity of donors or recipients in living-donor transplantation is a complex issue and practice varies widely. There are compelling arguments for maintaining anonymity of both parties before unspecified donor transplantation and specified indirect transplantation. After transplantation, there are still good reasons to avoid disclosure of identities. Although anonymity could be lifted if both parties explicitly request it, there are significant, potentially negative consequences of such an approach. Both donor and recipient should be counseled regarding these, and transplant teams should consider the considerable financial and psychosocial costs if problems are encountered as a result of contact. Given the recent rise in the number of unspecified living-donor transplants and through paired exchange schemes, it is vital that data are collected regarding the effects of maintaining or revoking anonymity after transplantation.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)536-541
Numero di pagine6
RivistaTransplantation
Volume95
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2013

Keywords

  • Altruism
  • Confidentiality
  • Emotions
  • Gift Giving
  • Humans
  • Interpersonal Relations
  • Living Donors
  • Organ Transplantation
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Anonymity and live-donor transplantation: an ELPAT view'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo