Abstract
Background: Somatic cell nuclear transfer is the method of choice to
generate transgenic large animals. Success largely depends on a high
expression level of the target protein.
Selection of cell clones with the desired expression level is of paramount
importance before nuclear transfer. In this work we compare different
methods that can be used on a small number of cells and their predictive
value.
Methods: Two expression vectors for CD55 and CD39 were separately
transfected to PK15 cell line. Following selection, five of the best growing
clones resulting from each transfection were expanded and subjected to
RT-PCR and Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analyses. For IHC analyses the
mAB IA10 (BD-Pharmingen) – for CD55 – and the mAB BU61 (Ancell) –
for CD39 – were used. The same antibodies were also used in Western blot
(WB) analyses performed on samples subjected to non-reducing SDS–PAGE
and electroblotted on PVDF membrane. The presence of the target
transcripts was confirmed by Northern blot (NB) analyses using DIGlabeled probes (Roche). The proteins expression was also analysed by FACS
conducted on chosen clones. Fibroblasts and PAECs deriving from one
CD55–CD39 stillborn cloned piglet were subjected to IHC, NB and FACS
analyses.
Results: Three out of five (#24, #2 and #15) PK15–CD55 clones were
positive to RT-PCR but only clone #24 was positive to IHC. Clone #24 was
further analysed by NB, WB and FACS that confirmed the high expression
level. Clone #2 revealed a low expression level by FACS not detected by
IHC. All five PK15–CD39 clones were positive to IHC and RT-PCR
analysis. Clone #10 was further analysed and confirmed positive by NB and
WB. The IHC, NB and FACS data obtained on fibroblasts and PAECs of
cloned piglet confirmed the donor cell lines CD39 expression detected by
IHC. This was not the case with CD55 expression since the positivity
detected by IHC was not confirmed with FACS and NB analyses.
Conclusion: IHC is the method of choice when few cells for each clone are
available, being more accurate than RT-PCR. Nevertheless, since this
technique is not accurately quantitative, it needs to be complemented with alternative methods (Western Blotting or Real time PCR) to obtain a more
complete evaluation of the expression pattern of the transgene
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
pagine (da-a) | 436-436 |
Numero di pagine | 1 |
Rivista | Xenotransplantation |
Volume | 16 |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2009 |
Evento | Joint Meeting of the
International Pancreas and Islet Transplant
Association (IPITA) and the International
Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) - Venezia Durata: 12 ott 2009 → 16 ott 2009 |
Keywords
- somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT)
- transgenic pig