Salta alla navigazione principale Salta alla ricerca Salta al contenuto principale

An MDS Evidence-Based Review on Treatments for Huntington's Disease

  • J. J. Ferreira*
  • , F. B. Rodrigues
  • , G. S. Duarte
  • , T. A. Mestre
  • , Bachoud-Levi A. -C.
  • , Anna Rita Bentivoglio
  • , Burgunder J. -M.
  • , F. Cardoso
  • , D. O. Claassen
  • , G. B. Landwehrmeyer
  • , J. Kulisevsky
  • , M. J. Nirenberg
  • , A. Rosser
  • , J. Roth
  • , K. Seppi
  • , J. Slawek
  • , E. Furr-Stimming
  • , S. J. Tabrizi
  • , F. O. Walker
  • , W. Vandenberghe
  • J. Costa, C. Sampaio
*Autore corrispondente per questo lavoro
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • CIBER - Center for Biomedical Research Network
  • Hematology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau
  • Autonomous University of Barcelona
  • Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute (Brain Research And Intracranial Neurotherapeutics Unit)
  • Charles University
  • Innsbruck Medical University
  • Medical University of Gdańsk
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • KU Leuven
  • University of Lisbon
  • Instituto Gulbenkian de Medicina Molecular
  • CHDI Foundation, Inc.

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo

Abstract

Background: Huntington's disease (HD) is a rare neurodegenerative disorder with protean clinical manifestations. Its management is challenging, consisting mainly of off-label treatments. Objectives: The International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society commissioned a task force to review and evaluate the evidence of available therapies for HD gene expansion carriers. Methods: We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Eligible randomized controlled trials were identified via an electronic search of the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases. All eligible trials that evaluated one or more of 33 predetermined clinical questions were included. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A framework was adapted to allow for efficacy and safety conclusions to be drawn from the balance between the GRADE level of evidence and the importance of the benefit/harm of the intervention. Results: Twenty-two eligible studies involving 17 interventions were included, providing data to address 8 clinical questions. These data supported a likely effect of deutetrabenazine on motor impairment, chorea, and dystonia and of tetrabenazine on chorea. The data did not support a disease-modifying effect for premanifest and manifest HD. There was no eligible evidence to support the use of specific treatments for depression, psychosis, irritability, apathy, or suicidality. Similarly, no evidence was eligible to support the use of physiotherapy, occupational therapy, exercise, dietary, or surgical treatments. Conclusions: Data for therapeutic interventions in HD are limited and support only the use of VMAT2 inhibitors for specific motor symptoms. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)25-35
Numero di pagine11
RivistaMovement Disorders
Volume37
Numero di pubblicazione1
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2022

OSS delle Nazioni Unite

Questo processo contribuisce al raggiungimento dei seguenti obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile

  1. SDG 3 - Salute e benessere
    SDG 3 Salute e benessere

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neurologia
  • Neurologia (clinica)

Keywords

  • Apathy
  • Chorea
  • GRADE approach
  • Humans
  • Huntington Disease
  • Huntington's disease
  • Movement Disorders
  • Tetrabenazine
  • drug therapy
  • evidence-based medicine

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'An MDS Evidence-Based Review on Treatments for Huntington's Disease'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo