TY - JOUR
T1 - An Italian consensus on pulmonary rehabilitation in COVID-19 patients recovering from acute respiratory failure: results of a Delphi process
AU - Vitacca, Michele
AU - Lazzeri, Marta
AU - Guffanti, Enrico
AU - Frigerio, Pamela
AU - D Abrosca, Francesco
AU - Gianola, Silvia
AU - Carone, Mauro
AU - Paneroni, Mara
AU - Ceriana, Piero
AU - Pasqua, Franco
AU - Pasquarelli, Franco
AU - Banfi, Paolo
AU - Gigliotti, Francesco
AU - Simonelli, Carla
AU - Cirio, Serena
AU - Rossi, Veronica
AU - Beccaluva, Chiara G.
AU - Retucci, Mariangela
AU - Santambrogio, Martina
AU - Lanza, Andrea
AU - Gallo, Francesca
AU - Fumagalli, Alessia
AU - Mantero, Marco
AU - Castellini, Greta
AU - Castellini, Greta
AU - Calabrese, Mariaconsiglia
AU - Castellana, Giorgio
AU - Volpato, Eleonora
AU - Ciriello, Marina
AU - Garofano, Marina
AU - Clini, Enrico
AU - Ambrosino, Nicolino
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - There is a need of consensus about the pulmonary rehabilitation
(PR) in patients with COVID-19 after discharge from acute
care. To facilitate the knowledge of the evidence and its translation
into practice, we developed suggestions based on experts’
opinion. A steering committee identified areas and questions sent
to experts. Other international experts participated to a RAND
Delphi method in reaching consensus and proposing further suggestions.
Strong agreement in suggestions was defined when the
mean agreement was >7 (1 = no agreement and 9 = maximal
agreement). Panelists response rate was >95%. Twenty-three
questions from 4 areas: personnel protection equipment, phenotypes,
assessments, interventions, were identified and experts
answered with 121 suggestions, 119 of which received high level
of concordance. The evidence-based suggestions provide the clinicians
with current evidence and clinical experts opinion. This
framework can be used to facilitate clinical decision making within
the context of the individual patient. Further studies will evaluate
the clinical usefulness of these suggestions.
AB - There is a need of consensus about the pulmonary rehabilitation
(PR) in patients with COVID-19 after discharge from acute
care. To facilitate the knowledge of the evidence and its translation
into practice, we developed suggestions based on experts’
opinion. A steering committee identified areas and questions sent
to experts. Other international experts participated to a RAND
Delphi method in reaching consensus and proposing further suggestions.
Strong agreement in suggestions was defined when the
mean agreement was >7 (1 = no agreement and 9 = maximal
agreement). Panelists response rate was >95%. Twenty-three
questions from 4 areas: personnel protection equipment, phenotypes,
assessments, interventions, were identified and experts
answered with 121 suggestions, 119 of which received high level
of concordance. The evidence-based suggestions provide the clinicians
with current evidence and clinical experts opinion. This
framework can be used to facilitate clinical decision making within
the context of the individual patient. Further studies will evaluate
the clinical usefulness of these suggestions.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Delphi process
KW - COVID-19
KW - Delphi process
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/157559
U2 - 10.4081/monaldi.2020.1444
DO - 10.4081/monaldi.2020.1444
M3 - Article
SN - 1122-0643
VL - 2020
SP - 385
EP - 393
JO - Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease
JF - Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease
ER -