Abstract
The 2003 Italian Corporate Reform Law, establishing one-tier vs two-tier board for listed and unlisted joint stock companies, introduced an alternative corporate governance system. This study implements probit regressions in order to compare 548 unlisted firms: corporations with better performance in sales and capital structure, as well as those subject to control and coordination , maintain a traditional system. Conversely, firms with a high proportion of individual shareholders adopt alternative systems. For alternative systems' firms, split between one-tier and two-tier boards, companies subjected to control and coordination action tend to implement a one-tier system, same as firms with a higher proportion of individual shareholders.
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 4-15 |
| Numero di pagine | 12 |
| Rivista | PROBLEMS & PERSPECTIVES IN MANAGEMENT |
| Volume | issue 3 |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2010 |
Keywords
- Corporate governance
- Sistema di amministrazione e controllo monistico
- Sistemi alternativi di amministrazione e controllo
- Sistemi di amministrazione e controllo alternativi
- alternative corporate governance system
- one-tier board
- two-tier board
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Alternative vs Traditional Corporate Governance Systems in Italy: An Empirical Analysis'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver