TY - JOUR
T1 - Alignment and Misalignment in Business Relationships
AU - Corsaro, Daniela
AU - Snehota, Ivan
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - ‘Alignment’ and ‘misalignment’ are terms commonly used both in strategy and in marketing. In B-to-B
marketing, in particular, researchers investigated alignment/misalignment between customers and suppliers
and recently discussed the effects of misalignment. Research in this field remains however fragmented. There
is ambiguity about the objects to be aligned, the processes that characterize their change, the effects on the
relationship development and the methods used to assess them. In general, the empirical research that has
examined the two concepts in business relationships is limited.
In this study we will develop a theoretical framework to assess alignments/misalignments in parties'
interpretations of a problem and its solution for the customer, in order to address the following questions:
How and why do alignment and misalignment change over time? When can misalignment be positive for the
relationship development?
We use data from a longitudinal study involving 84 customers and suppliers in the ICT Security Industry. The
first finding is that there are no patterns in how alignment changes, but there is a slight tendency toward
misalignment over time. Second, change in the alignment is mostly linked to parties' perceptions of the
available resources and how these resources are combined, along with parties' interpretations of critical
events. Finally, the research suggests that when parties are aware of misalignment, when misalignment is
perceptual and when there are no external constraints to action, the effort to align practices produces positive
effects, even when misalignment persists.
AB - ‘Alignment’ and ‘misalignment’ are terms commonly used both in strategy and in marketing. In B-to-B
marketing, in particular, researchers investigated alignment/misalignment between customers and suppliers
and recently discussed the effects of misalignment. Research in this field remains however fragmented. There
is ambiguity about the objects to be aligned, the processes that characterize their change, the effects on the
relationship development and the methods used to assess them. In general, the empirical research that has
examined the two concepts in business relationships is limited.
In this study we will develop a theoretical framework to assess alignments/misalignments in parties'
interpretations of a problem and its solution for the customer, in order to address the following questions:
How and why do alignment and misalignment change over time? When can misalignment be positive for the
relationship development?
We use data from a longitudinal study involving 84 customers and suppliers in the ICT Security Industry. The
first finding is that there are no patterns in how alignment changes, but there is a slight tendency toward
misalignment over time. Second, change in the alignment is mostly linked to parties' perceptions of the
available resources and how these resources are combined, along with parties' interpretations of critical
events. Finally, the research suggests that when parties are aware of misalignment, when misalignment is
perceptual and when there are no external constraints to action, the effort to align practices produces positive
effects, even when misalignment persists.
KW - Alignment
KW - Business relationships
KW - Misalignment
KW - Perceptions
KW - Solution
KW - Alignment
KW - Business relationships
KW - Misalignment
KW - Perceptions
KW - Solution
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/8276
UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s0019850111000976
U2 - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.038
DO - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.038
M3 - Article
SN - 0019-8501
VL - 40
SP - 1042
EP - 1054
JO - Industrial Marketing Management
JF - Industrial Marketing Management
ER -