Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Two Agricultural Systems: Conventional Tillage and No-Tillage

Vincenzo Tabaglio; Paolo Caprioli; Roberta Boselli; Andrea Fiorini; Cristina Ganimede; Giovanni Lazzari; Dora Ines Melo Ortiz; Stefano Santelli; Romano Demalde'

doi:10.6092/unibo/amsacta/5692

Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Two Agricultural Systems: Conventional Tillage and No-Tillage

Vincenzo Tabaglio, Paolo Caprioli, Roberta Boselli, Andrea Fiorini, Cristina Ganimede, Giovanni Lazzari, Dora Ines Melo Ortiz, Stefano Santelli, Romano Demalde'

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in libro › Contributo a convegno

Abstract

A field trial was carried out to compare two agricultural management systems in the Po Valley (Northern Italy): Conventional tillage (CT) vs. No-tillage (NT). The different management of the experimental field had been established since 2011. In 2014 the trial was cropped with maize and CT system was compared with NT system concerning crop yields, soil characteristics and operating costs. Experimental trial was set up as randomized complete block design with four replicates. The soil is a fine, mixed, mesic, Udertic Haplustalf. The software C.E.M.A. was used to determine operating costs and fuel consumption of the two agro-ecosystems. In term of net income it was observed a difference of about 100 € per hectare in favor of NT system. Regarding greenhouse gases emissions NT saved about 360 kg per hectare of CO2.

Lingua originale	English
Titolo della pubblicazione ospite	Integrated strategies for agro-ecosystem management to address climate change challenges
Pagine	181-184
Numero di pagine	4
DOI	https://doi.org/10.6092/unibo/amsacta/5692
Stato di pubblicazione	Pubblicato - 2017
Evento	XX Convegno Nazionale dell’Associazione Italiana di Agrometeorologia (AIAM) e XLVI Convegno Nazionale della Società Italiana di Agronomia (SIA) - Milano Durata: 12 set 2017 → 14 set 2017

Convegno

Convegno	XX Convegno Nazionale dell’Associazione Italiana di Agrometeorologia (AIAM) e XLVI Convegno Nazionale della Società Italiana di Agronomia (SIA)
Città	Milano
Periodo	12/9/17 → 14/9/17

Keywords

GHG emission
climate change mitigation
conventional tillage
costi operativi
crop yields
emissioni gas serra
farmers’ net income
lavorazione convenzionale
mitigazione cambiamento climatico
no-tillage
non lavorazione
operating costs
reddito netto
rese colturali

OSS delle Nazioni Unite

Questo processo contribuisce al raggiungimento dei seguenti obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile

Accesso al documento

10.6092/unibo/amsacta/5692

Altri file e collegamenti

Link a IRIS PubliCatt

Cita questo

Tabaglio, V., Caprioli, P., Boselli, R., Fiorini, A., Ganimede, C., Lazzari, G., Melo Ortiz, D. I., Santelli, S., & Demalde', R. (2017). Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Two Agricultural Systems: Conventional Tillage and No-Tillage. In Integrated strategies for agro-ecosystem management to address climate change challenges (pagg. 181-184) https://doi.org/10.6092/unibo/amsacta/5692

@inproceedings{5a0961a4a4ea4d74b8d4bfcb62c11472,

title = "Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Two Agricultural Systems: Conventional Tillage and No-Tillage",

abstract = "A field trial was carried out to compare two agricultural management systems in the Po Valley (Northern Italy): Conventional tillage (CT) vs. No-tillage (NT). The different management of the experimental field had been established since 2011. In 2014 the trial was cropped with maize and CT system was compared with NT system concerning crop yields, soil characteristics and operating costs. Experimental trial was set up as randomized complete block design with four replicates. The soil is a fine, mixed, mesic, Udertic Haplustalf. The software C.E.M.A. was used to determine operating costs and fuel consumption of the two agro-ecosystems. In term of net income it was observed a difference of about 100 € per hectare in favor of NT system. Regarding greenhouse gases emissions NT saved about 360 kg per hectare of CO2.",

keywords = "GHG emission, climate change mitigation, conventional tillage, costi operativi, crop yields, emissioni gas serra, farmers{\textquoteright} net income, lavorazione convenzionale, mitigazione cambiamento climatico, no-tillage, non lavorazione, operating costs, reddito netto, rese colturali, GHG emission, climate change mitigation, conventional tillage, costi operativi, crop yields, emissioni gas serra, farmers{\textquoteright} net income, lavorazione convenzionale, mitigazione cambiamento climatico, no-tillage, non lavorazione, operating costs, reddito netto, rese colturali",

author = "Vincenzo Tabaglio and Paolo Caprioli and Roberta Boselli and Andrea Fiorini and Cristina Ganimede and Giovanni Lazzari and {Melo Ortiz}, {Dora Ines} and Stefano Santelli and Romano Demalde'",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.6092/unibo/amsacta/5692",

language = "English",

isbn = "9788898010707",

pages = "181--184",

booktitle = "Integrated strategies for agro-ecosystem management to address climate change challenges",

note = "XX Convegno Nazionale dell{\textquoteright}Associazione Italiana di Agrometeorologia (AIAM) e XLVI Convegno Nazionale della Societ{\`a} Italiana di Agronomia (SIA) ; Conference date: 12-09-2017 Through 14-09-2017",

}

Tabaglio, V, Caprioli, P, Boselli, R, Fiorini, A, Ganimede, C, Lazzari, G, Melo Ortiz, DI, Santelli, S & Demalde', R 2017, Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Two Agricultural Systems: Conventional Tillage and No-Tillage. in Integrated strategies for agro-ecosystem management to address climate change challenges. pagg. 181-184, XX Convegno Nazionale dell’Associazione Italiana di Agrometeorologia (AIAM) e XLVI Convegno Nazionale della Società Italiana di Agronomia (SIA), Milano, 12/9/17. https://doi.org/10.6092/unibo/amsacta/5692

TY - GEN

T1 - Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Two Agricultural Systems: Conventional Tillage and No-Tillage

AU - Tabaglio, Vincenzo

AU - Caprioli, Paolo

AU - Boselli, Roberta

AU - Fiorini, Andrea

AU - Ganimede, Cristina

AU - Lazzari, Giovanni

AU - Melo Ortiz, Dora Ines

AU - Santelli, Stefano

AU - Demalde', Romano

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - A field trial was carried out to compare two agricultural management systems in the Po Valley (Northern Italy): Conventional tillage (CT) vs. No-tillage (NT). The different management of the experimental field had been established since 2011. In 2014 the trial was cropped with maize and CT system was compared with NT system concerning crop yields, soil characteristics and operating costs. Experimental trial was set up as randomized complete block design with four replicates. The soil is a fine, mixed, mesic, Udertic Haplustalf. The software C.E.M.A. was used to determine operating costs and fuel consumption of the two agro-ecosystems. In term of net income it was observed a difference of about 100 € per hectare in favor of NT system. Regarding greenhouse gases emissions NT saved about 360 kg per hectare of CO2.

AB - A field trial was carried out to compare two agricultural management systems in the Po Valley (Northern Italy): Conventional tillage (CT) vs. No-tillage (NT). The different management of the experimental field had been established since 2011. In 2014 the trial was cropped with maize and CT system was compared with NT system concerning crop yields, soil characteristics and operating costs. Experimental trial was set up as randomized complete block design with four replicates. The soil is a fine, mixed, mesic, Udertic Haplustalf. The software C.E.M.A. was used to determine operating costs and fuel consumption of the two agro-ecosystems. In term of net income it was observed a difference of about 100 € per hectare in favor of NT system. Regarding greenhouse gases emissions NT saved about 360 kg per hectare of CO2.

KW - GHG emission

KW - climate change mitigation

KW - conventional tillage

KW - costi operativi

KW - crop yields

KW - emissioni gas serra

KW - farmers’ net income

KW - lavorazione convenzionale

KW - mitigazione cambiamento climatico

KW - no-tillage

KW - non lavorazione

KW - operating costs

KW - reddito netto

KW - rese colturali

KW - GHG emission

KW - climate change mitigation

KW - conventional tillage

KW - costi operativi

KW - crop yields

KW - emissioni gas serra

KW - farmers’ net income

KW - lavorazione convenzionale

KW - mitigazione cambiamento climatico

KW - no-tillage

KW - non lavorazione

KW - operating costs

KW - reddito netto

KW - rese colturali

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/107024

U2 - 10.6092/unibo/amsacta/5692

DO - 10.6092/unibo/amsacta/5692

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9788898010707

SP - 181

EP - 184

BT - Integrated strategies for agro-ecosystem management to address climate change challenges

T2 - XX Convegno Nazionale dell’Associazione Italiana di Agrometeorologia (AIAM) e XLVI Convegno Nazionale della Società Italiana di Agronomia (SIA)

Y2 - 12 September 2017 through 14 September 2017

ER -

Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Two Agricultural Systems: Conventional Tillage and No-Tillage

Abstract

Convegno

Keywords

OSS delle Nazioni Unite

Accesso al documento

Altri file e collegamenti

Fingerprint

Cita questo