TY - JOUR
T1 - Aggressive behavior and metacognitive functions: A longitudinal study on patients with mental disorders
AU - Candini, V.
AU - Ghisi, M.
AU - Bianconi, G.
AU - Bulgari, V.
AU - Carcione, A.
AU - Cavalera, Cesare Massimo
AU - Conte, G.
AU - Cricelli, M.
AU - Ferla, M. T.
AU - Ferrari, C.
AU - Iozzino, L.
AU - Macis, A.
AU - Nicolo, G.
AU - Stefana, A.
AU - Stefana, A.
AU - De, Girolamo G.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background: Metacognitive functions play a key role in understanding which psychological variables underlying the personality might lead a person with a severe mental disorder to commit violent acts against others. The aims of this study were to: (a) investigate the differences between patients with poor metacognitive functioning (PM group) and patients with good metacognitive functioning (GM group) in relation to a history of violence; (b) investigate the differences between the two groups in relation to aggressive behavior during a 1-year follow-up; and (c) analyze the predictors of aggressive behavior. Methods: In a prospective cohort study, patients with severe mental disorders with and without a lifetime history of serious violence were assessed with a large set of standardized instruments and were evaluated bi-monthly with MOAS in order to monitor any aggressive behavior. The total sample included 180 patients: 56% outpatients and 44% inpatients, and the majority were male (75%) with a mean age of 44 (± 9.8) years, and half of them had a history of violence. The sample was split into two groups: poor metacognition (PM) group and good metacognition (GM) group, according to MAI evaluation scores. Results: The PM patients reported a history of violence more frequently than GM patients, during the 1-year follow-up, but no differences between groups in aggressive and violent behavior were found. The strongest predictors of aggressive behavior were: borderline and passive-aggressive personality traits and a history of violence, anger, and hostility. The metacognitive functions alone did not predict aggressive behavior, but metacognitive functions interacted with hostility and angry reactions in predicting aggressive behavior. Conclusions: This study led to some important conclusions: (a) some aspects closely related to violence are predictive of aggressive behavior only in patients with poor metacognition, thus good metacognition is a protective factor; (b) poor metacognition is associated with a history of violence, which in turn increases the risk of committing aggressive behavior.
AB - Background: Metacognitive functions play a key role in understanding which psychological variables underlying the personality might lead a person with a severe mental disorder to commit violent acts against others. The aims of this study were to: (a) investigate the differences between patients with poor metacognitive functioning (PM group) and patients with good metacognitive functioning (GM group) in relation to a history of violence; (b) investigate the differences between the two groups in relation to aggressive behavior during a 1-year follow-up; and (c) analyze the predictors of aggressive behavior. Methods: In a prospective cohort study, patients with severe mental disorders with and without a lifetime history of serious violence were assessed with a large set of standardized instruments and were evaluated bi-monthly with MOAS in order to monitor any aggressive behavior. The total sample included 180 patients: 56% outpatients and 44% inpatients, and the majority were male (75%) with a mean age of 44 (± 9.8) years, and half of them had a history of violence. The sample was split into two groups: poor metacognition (PM) group and good metacognition (GM) group, according to MAI evaluation scores. Results: The PM patients reported a history of violence more frequently than GM patients, during the 1-year follow-up, but no differences between groups in aggressive and violent behavior were found. The strongest predictors of aggressive behavior were: borderline and passive-aggressive personality traits and a history of violence, anger, and hostility. The metacognitive functions alone did not predict aggressive behavior, but metacognitive functions interacted with hostility and angry reactions in predicting aggressive behavior. Conclusions: This study led to some important conclusions: (a) some aspects closely related to violence are predictive of aggressive behavior only in patients with poor metacognition, thus good metacognition is a protective factor; (b) poor metacognition is associated with a history of violence, which in turn increases the risk of committing aggressive behavior.
KW - Aggressive behavior
KW - Internal mental states
KW - Mental disorders
KW - Metacognition
KW - Risk of violence
KW - Aggressive behavior
KW - Internal mental states
KW - Mental disorders
KW - Metacognition
KW - Risk of violence
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/201422
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087049242&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087049242&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1186/s12991-020-00286-3
DO - 10.1186/s12991-020-00286-3
M3 - Article
SN - 1744-859X
VL - 19
SP - 36
EP - 48
JO - Annals of General Psychiatry
JF - Annals of General Psychiatry
IS - 1
ER -