Age-related differences in contribution of rule-based thinking toward moral evaluations

Simona Carla Silvia Caravita, Lindamulage N. De Silva, Vera Pagani, Barbara Colombo, Alessandro Antonietti

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

1 Citazioni (Scopus)


This study aims to investigate the interplay of different criteria of moral evaluation, related to the type of the rule and context characteristics, in moral reasoning of children, early, and late adolescents. Students attending to fourth, seventh, and tenth grade were asked to evaluate the acceptability of rule breaking actions using ad hoc scenarios. Results suggest that the role of different moral evaluation criteria changes by age. During adolescence a greater integration of the moral criteria emerged. Moreover, adolescents also prioritized the evaluation of moral rule (forbidding to harm others) violations as non-acceptable when the perpetrator harms an innocent victim by applying a direct personal force. The relevance of these findings to increase the understanding of how moral reasoning changes by age for the assessment of impairments in moral reasoning of non-normative groups is also discussed.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)1-11
Numero di pagine11
RivistaFrontiers in Psychology
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2017


  • moral reasoning


Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Age-related differences in contribution of rule-based thinking toward moral evaluations'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo