Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) among the Italian Dementia Centers: a study by the Italian DLB study group (DLB-SINdem)

  • M. Russo
  • , C. Carrarini
  • , Iorio A. Di
  • , R. Pellegrino
  • , A. C. Bruni
  • , S. Caratozzolo
  • , A. Chiari
  • , S. Pretta
  • , Camillo Marra
  • , M. S. Cotelli
  • , A. Arighi
  • , G. G. Fumagalli
  • , T. Cataruzza
  • , F. Caso
  • , C. Paci
  • , M. Rosso
  • , S. Amici
  • , D. Giannandrea
  • , A. Pilotto
  • , S. Luzzi
  • A. Castellano, F. D'antonio, A. Luca, G. Gelosa, T. Piccoli, M. Mauri, F. Agosta, C. Babiloni, B. Borroni, M. Bozzali, M. Filippi, D. Galimberti, R. Monastero, C. Muscio, L. Parnetti, D. Perani, L. Serra, V. Silani, P. Tiraboschi, A. Cagnin, A. Padovani, L. Bonanni*, B. Roberta, F. Federica, G. Sebastiano, G. Caterina, G. Gianmarco, M. Giuseppe, M. Giulia, M. Stefano, R. Carmela, R. Marco, S. Pierpaolo, S. P. Giuseppe, T. Marinella, V. Federico, V. M. Antonietta
*Autore corrispondente per questo lavoro

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo

Abstract

Introduction: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) may represent a diagnostic challenge, since its clinical picture overlaps with other dementia. Two toolkits have been developed to aid the clinician to diagnose DLB: the Lewy Body Composite Risk Score (LBCRS) and the Assessment Toolkit for DLB (AT-DLB). We aim to evaluate the reliability of these two questionnaires, and their ability to enhance the interpretation of the international consensus diagnostic criteria. Methods: LBCRS and AT-DLB were distributed to 135 Italian Neurological Centers for Cognitive Decline and Dementia (CDCDs), with the indication to administer them to all patients with dementia referred within the subsequent 3 months. We asked to subsequently apply consensus criteria for DLB diagnosis, to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the two toolkits. Results: A total of 23 Centers joined the study; 1854 patients were enrolled. We found a prevalence of possible or probable DLB of 13% each (26% total), according to the consensus criteria. LBCRS toolkit showed good reliability, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.77, stable even after removing variables from the construct. AT-DLB toolkit Cronbach alpha was 0.52 and, after the subtraction of the “cognitive fluctuation” criterion, was only 0.31. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were higher for LBCRS vs. AT-DLB. However, when simultaneously considered in the logistic models, AT-DLB showed a better performance (p < 0.001). Overall, the concordance between LBCRS positive and AT-DLB possible/probable was of 78.02% Conclusions: In a clinical setting, the LBCRS and AT-DLB questionnaires have good accuracy for DLB diagnosis.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)4221-4229
Numero di pagine6
RivistaNeurological Sciences
Volume43
Numero di pubblicazione7
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dermatologia
  • Neurologia (clinica)
  • Psichiatria e Salute Mentale

Keywords

  • Clinical diagnosis
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Consensus criteria
  • Dementia
  • Dementia with Lewy bodies
  • Diagnostic accuracy
  • Diagnostic toolkits

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) among the Italian Dementia Centers: a study by the Italian DLB study group (DLB-SINdem)'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo