Accreditation for excellence of cancer research institutes: Recommendations from the Italian Network of Comprehensive Cancer Centers

Ruggero De Maria Marchiano, Vincenzo Fusco, Pietro Luigi Deriu, Leonardo La Pietra, Marco Pierotti, Raffaele Collazzo, Angelo Paradiso, Filippo Belardelli, Paolo De Paoli, Aldo Nigro, Rosanna Lacalamita, Manlio Ferrarini, Piergiuseppe Pelicci, Anna Roli, Gennaro Ciliberto, Stefania Scala, Alberto Amadori, Daniela Chiusole, Pellegrino Musto, Giovanni StortoStefano Canitano, Giovanni Apolone, Maria Ravelli, Elisa Mazzini, Dino Amadori, Marna Bernabini, Valentina Ancarani, Claudio Lombardo

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

11 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

A panel of experts from Italian Comprehensive Cancer Centers defines the recommendations for external quality control programs aimed to accreditation to excellence of these institutes. After definition of the process as a systematic, periodic evaluation performed by an external agency to verify whether a health organization possesses certain prerequisites regarding structural, organizational and operational conditions that are thought to affect health care quality, the panel reviews models internationally available and makes final recommendations on aspects considered of main interest. This position paper has been produced within a special project of the Ministry of Health of the Italian Government aimed to accredit, according to OECI model, 11 Italian cancer centers in the period 2012-2014. The Project represents the effort undertaken by this network of Comprehensive Cancer Centers to find a common denominator for the experience of all Institutes in external quality control programs. Fourteen shared "statements" are put forth, designed to offer some indications on the main aspects of this subject, based on literature evidence or expert opinions. They deal with the need for "accountability" and involvement of the entire organization, the effectiveness of self-evaluation, the temporal continuity and the educational value of the experience, the use of indicators and measurement tools, additionally for intra- and inter-organization comparison, the system of evaluation models used, the provision for specific requisites for oncology, and the opportunity for mutual exchange of evaluation experiences. Copyright - Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)e293-e298
RivistaTumori
Volume99
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2013

Keywords

  • Accreditation
  • Benchmarking
  • Biomedical Research
  • Cancer Care Facilities
  • Cancer Research
  • Cancer institute
  • Clinical Competence
  • Critical Pathways
  • Government Agencies
  • Health Personnel
  • Humans
  • Inservice Training
  • Internationality
  • Italy
  • Oncology
  • Peer Review
  • Quality Control
  • Quality improvement
  • Quality of Health Care
  • Research
  • Research Personnel
  • Social Responsibility

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Accreditation for excellence of cancer research institutes: Recommendations from the Italian Network of Comprehensive Cancer Centers'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo