Abstract
Microsurgery has been shown to reduce the risk of adhesion formation when compared to conventional surgery in cases of benign ovarian pathology. However, the microsurgeons have contrasting opinions concerning the use of absorbable versus non-casebable suture materials. In the present study we compared nylon versus vicryl sutures for ovarian surgery using the rabbit as an experimental model. No differences were found in terms not only of post-operative adhesions but also in terms of post-operative reproductive outcome for the sutures analyzed.
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 309-311 |
| Numero di pagine | 3 |
| Rivista | ACTA EUROPAEA FERTILITATIS |
| Volume | 1990/21 |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 1990 |
Keywords
- Animal
- Biocompatible Materials
- Comparative Study
- Female
- Microsurgery
- Models, Biological
- Ovary
- Postoperative Complications
- Pregnancy
- Rabbits
- Sutures
- article
- female
- infertility
- microsurgery
- nonhuman
- priority journal
- rabbit, Adhesions
- suture material, animal experiment
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures in ovarian microsurgery: Experimental results in the rabbit model'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver