A study of undergraduate and graduate students' argumentation in learning contexts of higher education

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in libroContributo a conferenza

Abstract

This study sets out to examine to what extent the arguments used by undergraduate and graduate students refer to scientific notions and theories related to the discipline taught in the course. The results of this study indicate that only graduate students advance arguments that refer to scientific notions and theories strictly or somehow related to the discipline taught in the course, whereas undergraduate students typically advance arguments based on common-sense knowledge and previous personal experience.
Lingua originaleInglese
Titolo della pubblicazione ospiteProceedings of the Eighth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation
Pagine173-185
Numero di pagine13
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2015
Evento8th International Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference (ISSA) - AMSTERDAM -- NLD
Durata: 1 lug 20144 lug 2014

Convegno

Convegno8th International Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference (ISSA)
CittàAMSTERDAM -- NLD
Periodo1/7/144/7/14

Keywords

  • Argumentation
  • Higher education
  • Qualitative research
  • Student-teacher interaction
  • Teaching strategies

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'A study of undergraduate and graduate students' argumentation in learning contexts of higher education'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo