A structural interpretation of measurement and some related epistemological issues

Luca Mari; Luca Paolo Mari; Paolo Carbone; Alessandro Giordani; Alessandro Giordani; Dario Petri

doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.08.001

A structural interpretation of measurement and some related epistemological issues

Luca Mari, Luca Paolo Mari, Paolo Carbone, Alessandro Giordani, Alessandro Giordani, Dario Petri

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivista › Articolo in rivista › peer review

10 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

Measurement is widely applied because its results are assumed to be more reliable than opinions and guesses, but this reliability is sometimes justified in a stereotyped way. After a critical analysis of such stereotypes, a structural characterization of measurement is proposed, as partly empirical and partly theoretical process, by showing that it is in fact the structure of the process that guarantees the reliability of its results. On this basis the role and the structure of background knowledge in measurement and the justification of the conditions of object-relatedness ("objectivity") and subject-independence ("intersubjectivity") of measurement are specifically discussed.

Lingua originale	English
pagine (da-a)	46-56
Numero di pagine	11
Rivista	Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Volume	65-66
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.08.001
Stato di pubblicazione	Pubblicato - 2017

Keywords

Measurement
Models in measurement
Objectivity and intersubjectivity in measurement
Stereotypes of measurement

Accesso al documento

10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.08.001

Altri file e collegamenti

Cita questo

@article{7585c3f33116475aaf113ab1a6ba6b6f,

title = "A structural interpretation of measurement and some related epistemological issues",

abstract = "Measurement is widely applied because its results are assumed to be more reliable than opinions and guesses, but this reliability is sometimes justified in a stereotyped way. After a critical analysis of such stereotypes, a structural characterization of measurement is proposed, as partly empirical and partly theoretical process, by showing that it is in fact the structure of the process that guarantees the reliability of its results. On this basis the role and the structure of background knowledge in measurement and the justification of the conditions of object-relatedness ({"}objectivity{"}) and subject-independence ({"}intersubjectivity{"}) of measurement are specifically discussed.",

keywords = "Measurement, Models in measurement, Objectivity and intersubjectivity in measurement, Stereotypes of measurement, Measurement, Models in measurement, Objectivity and intersubjectivity in measurement, Stereotypes of measurement",

author = "Luca Mari and Mari, {Luca Paolo} and Paolo Carbone and Alessandro Giordani and Alessandro Giordani and Dario Petri",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.08.001",

language = "English",

volume = "65-66",

pages = "46--56",

journal = "Studies in History and Philosophy of Science",

issn = "0039-3681",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A structural interpretation of measurement and some related epistemological issues

AU - Mari, Luca

AU - Mari, Luca Paolo

AU - Carbone, Paolo

AU - Giordani, Alessandro

AU - Petri, Dario

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Measurement is widely applied because its results are assumed to be more reliable than opinions and guesses, but this reliability is sometimes justified in a stereotyped way. After a critical analysis of such stereotypes, a structural characterization of measurement is proposed, as partly empirical and partly theoretical process, by showing that it is in fact the structure of the process that guarantees the reliability of its results. On this basis the role and the structure of background knowledge in measurement and the justification of the conditions of object-relatedness ("objectivity") and subject-independence ("intersubjectivity") of measurement are specifically discussed.

AB - Measurement is widely applied because its results are assumed to be more reliable than opinions and guesses, but this reliability is sometimes justified in a stereotyped way. After a critical analysis of such stereotypes, a structural characterization of measurement is proposed, as partly empirical and partly theoretical process, by showing that it is in fact the structure of the process that guarantees the reliability of its results. On this basis the role and the structure of background knowledge in measurement and the justification of the conditions of object-relatedness ("objectivity") and subject-independence ("intersubjectivity") of measurement are specifically discussed.

KW - Measurement

KW - Models in measurement

KW - Objectivity and intersubjectivity in measurement

KW - Stereotypes of measurement

KW - Measurement

KW - Models in measurement

KW - Objectivity and intersubjectivity in measurement

KW - Stereotypes of measurement

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/105711

UR - http://www.elsevier.com/locate/issn/00393681

U2 - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.08.001

M3 - Article

SN - 0039-3681

VL - 65-66

SP - 46

EP - 56

JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

ER -

A structural interpretation of measurement and some related epistemological issues

Abstract

Keywords

Accesso al documento

Altri file e collegamenti

Fingerprint

Cita questo