Abstract
A question that arises from the literature on therapy is whether second-level treatment is effective for patients with recurrent binge eating who fail first-level treatment. It has been shown that subjects who do not stop binge eating after an initial structured cognitive-behavioural treatment (CBT) programme benefit from additional CBT (A-CBT) sessions; however, it has been suggested that these resistant patients would benefit even more from cue exposure therapy (CET) targeting features associated with poor response (e.g. urge to binge in response to a cue and anxiety experienced in the presence of binge-related cues). We assessed the effectiveness of virtual reality-CET as a second-level treatment strategy for 64 patients with bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder who had been treated with limited results after using a structured CBT programme, in comparison with A-CBT. The significant differences observed between the two groups at post-treatment in dimensional (behavioural and attitudinal features, anxiety, food craving) and categorical (abstinence rates) outcomes highlighted the superiority of virtual reality-CET over A-CBT. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
pagine (da-a) | 479-490 |
Numero di pagine | 12 |
Rivista | European Eating Disorders Review |
Volume | 25 |
DOI | |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2017 |
Keywords
- Adult
- Anxiety
- Binge-Eating Disorder
- Bulimia Nervosa
- Clinical Psychology
- Cognitive Therapy
- Craving
- Cues
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Psychiatry and Mental Health
- Treatment Outcome
- Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy
- binge eating disorders
- bulimia nervosa
- cue exposure
- treatment
- virtual reality