TY - JOUR
T1 - A new clinical score for cranial CT in ED non-trauma patients: Definition and first validation.
AU - Covino, Marcello
AU - Gilardi, Emanuele
AU - Manno, Alberto
AU - Simeoni, Benedetta
AU - Ojetti, Veronica
AU - Cordischi, Chiara
AU - Forte, Evelina
AU - Carbone, Luigi
AU - Gaudino, Simona
AU - Franceschi, Francesco
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Introduction:Well recognized guidelines are available for the use of cranial computed tomography (CCT) in traumatic
patients,while no definitely accepted standards exists to for CCT in patientswithout history of head injury.
The aimof this study is to propose an easy clinical score to stratify the need of CCT inemergency department (ED)
patients with suspect non-traumatic intracranial pathology.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients presenting to the ED for neurological deficit, postural instability,
acute headache, alteredmental status, seizures, confusion, dizziness, vertigo, syncope, and pre-syncope.Webuild
a score for positive CCT prediction by using a logistic regression model on clinical factors significant at univariate
analysis. The score was validated on a population of prospectively observed patients.
Results: We reviewed clinical data of 1156 patients; positivity of CCT was 15.2%. Persistent neurological deficit,
new onset acute headache, seizures and/or altered state of consciousness, and transient neurological disorders
were independent predictors of positive CCT. We observed 508 patients in a validation prospective cohort;
CCT was positive in 11.3%. Our score performed well in validation population with a ROC AUC of 0.787 (CI 95%
0.748–0.822). Avoiding CT in score 0 patients would have saved 82 (16.2%) exams. No patients with score 0
had a positive CCT findings; score sensitivity was 100.0 (CI 95% 93.7–100.0).
Conclusions: A score for risk stratification of patients with suspect of intra-cranial pathology could reduce CT request
in ED, avoiding a significant number of CCT while minimizing the risk of missing positive results.
AB - Introduction:Well recognized guidelines are available for the use of cranial computed tomography (CCT) in traumatic
patients,while no definitely accepted standards exists to for CCT in patientswithout history of head injury.
The aimof this study is to propose an easy clinical score to stratify the need of CCT inemergency department (ED)
patients with suspect non-traumatic intracranial pathology.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients presenting to the ED for neurological deficit, postural instability,
acute headache, alteredmental status, seizures, confusion, dizziness, vertigo, syncope, and pre-syncope.Webuild
a score for positive CCT prediction by using a logistic regression model on clinical factors significant at univariate
analysis. The score was validated on a population of prospectively observed patients.
Results: We reviewed clinical data of 1156 patients; positivity of CCT was 15.2%. Persistent neurological deficit,
new onset acute headache, seizures and/or altered state of consciousness, and transient neurological disorders
were independent predictors of positive CCT. We observed 508 patients in a validation prospective cohort;
CCT was positive in 11.3%. Our score performed well in validation population with a ROC AUC of 0.787 (CI 95%
0.748–0.822). Avoiding CT in score 0 patients would have saved 82 (16.2%) exams. No patients with score 0
had a positive CCT findings; score sensitivity was 100.0 (CI 95% 93.7–100.0).
Conclusions: A score for risk stratification of patients with suspect of intra-cranial pathology could reduce CT request
in ED, avoiding a significant number of CCT while minimizing the risk of missing positive results.
KW - Clinical score
KW - Computed tomography
KW - Cranial
KW - Emergency department
KW - Clinical score
KW - Computed tomography
KW - Cranial
KW - Emergency department
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/152198
M3 - Article
SN - 0735-6757
VL - 2018
SP - 1279
EP - 1284
JO - THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
JF - THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
ER -