TY - JOUR
T1 - A network meta-analysis provides new insight into fungicide scheduling for the control of Botrytis cinerea in vineyards
AU - Gonzalez Dominguez, Elisa
AU - Fedele, Giorgia
AU - Caffi, Tito
AU - Delière, Laurent
AU - Sauris, Pierre
AU - Gramaje, David
AU - Ramos-Saez De Ojer, José Luis
AU - Díaz-Losada, Emilia
AU - Díez-Navajas, Ana M
AU - Bengoa, Paul
AU - Rossi, Vittorio
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - BACKGROUND: Control of Botrytis bunch rot (BBR) is currently based on the application of fungicides at four timings corresponding to specific growth stages of vines: end of flowering (A), pre-bunch closure (B), veraison (C) and before harvest (D). The current research provides a network meta-analysis of 116 studies conducted between 1963 and 2016 in nine countries, in which 14 strategies (based on combinations of 1, 2, 3, or 4 sprays applied in A, B, C, and/or D) were compared. RESULTS: When a one-spray strategy was applied, BBR control was more effective with sprays applied in A, C, or D than B. With a two-spray strategy, strategy AC provided similar control as strategy BC; strategy CD also provided good control. For a 3-spray strategy, the best disease control was consistently obtained with strategy ACD. Four-spray strategy ABCD provided the best control but often involved needless sprays so that the routine application of four sprays is not justified. CONCLUSIONS: Spraying at timing A seems to be very important for achieving efficient and flexible disease control. Flexibility is reduced by spraying at timing B rather than A. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.
AB - BACKGROUND: Control of Botrytis bunch rot (BBR) is currently based on the application of fungicides at four timings corresponding to specific growth stages of vines: end of flowering (A), pre-bunch closure (B), veraison (C) and before harvest (D). The current research provides a network meta-analysis of 116 studies conducted between 1963 and 2016 in nine countries, in which 14 strategies (based on combinations of 1, 2, 3, or 4 sprays applied in A, B, C, and/or D) were compared. RESULTS: When a one-spray strategy was applied, BBR control was more effective with sprays applied in A, C, or D than B. With a two-spray strategy, strategy AC provided similar control as strategy BC; strategy CD also provided good control. For a 3-spray strategy, the best disease control was consistently obtained with strategy ACD. Four-spray strategy ABCD provided the best control but often involved needless sprays so that the routine application of four sprays is not justified. CONCLUSIONS: Spraying at timing A seems to be very important for achieving efficient and flexible disease control. Flexibility is reduced by spraying at timing B rather than A. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.
KW - Botrytis bunch rot
KW - disease management
KW - grey mould
KW - network meta-analysis
KW - Botrytis bunch rot
KW - disease management
KW - grey mould
KW - network meta-analysis
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/128167
UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(issn)1526-4998
U2 - 10.1002/ps.5116
DO - 10.1002/ps.5116
M3 - Article
SN - 1526-498X
VL - 75
SP - 324
EP - 332
JO - Pest Management Science
JF - Pest Management Science
ER -