TY - JOUR
T1 - A Multistep, Consensus-Based Approach to Organ Allocation in Liver Transplantation: Toward a "blended Principle Model"
AU - Avolio, Alfonso Wolfango
AU - Sacchini, Dario
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Since Italian liver allocation policy was last revised (in 2012), relevant critical issues and conceptual advances have emerged, calling for significant improvements. We report the results of a national consensus conference process, promoted by the Italian College of Liver Transplant Surgeons (for the Italian Society for Organ Transplantation) and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver, to review the best indicators for orienting organ allocation policies based on principles of urgency, utility, and transplant benefit in the light of current scientific evidence. MELD exceptions and hepatocellular carcinoma were analyzed to construct a transplantation priority algorithm, given the inequity of a purely MELD-based system for governing organ allocation. Working groups of transplant surgeons and hepatologists prepared a list of statements for each topic, scoring their quality of evidence and strength of recommendation using the Centers for Disease Control grading system. A jury of Italian transplant surgeons, hepatologists, intensivists, infectious disease specialists, epidemiologists, representatives of patients' associations and organ-sharing organizations, transplant coordinators, and ethicists voted on and validated the proposed statements. After carefully reviewing the statements, a critical proposal for revising Italy's current liver allocation policy was prepared jointly by transplant surgeons and hepatologists.
AB - Since Italian liver allocation policy was last revised (in 2012), relevant critical issues and conceptual advances have emerged, calling for significant improvements. We report the results of a national consensus conference process, promoted by the Italian College of Liver Transplant Surgeons (for the Italian Society for Organ Transplantation) and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver, to review the best indicators for orienting organ allocation policies based on principles of urgency, utility, and transplant benefit in the light of current scientific evidence. MELD exceptions and hepatocellular carcinoma were analyzed to construct a transplantation priority algorithm, given the inequity of a purely MELD-based system for governing organ allocation. Working groups of transplant surgeons and hepatologists prepared a list of statements for each topic, scoring their quality of evidence and strength of recommendation using the Centers for Disease Control grading system. A jury of Italian transplant surgeons, hepatologists, intensivists, infectious disease specialists, epidemiologists, representatives of patients' associations and organ-sharing organizations, transplant coordinators, and ethicists voted on and validated the proposed statements. After carefully reviewing the statements, a critical proposal for revising Italy's current liver allocation policy was prepared jointly by transplant surgeons and hepatologists.
KW - Algorithms
KW - Decision Support Techniques
KW - Health Care Rationing
KW - Humans
KW - Italy
KW - Liver Diseases
KW - Liver Transplantation
KW - Patient Selection
KW - Severity of Illness Index
KW - Algorithms
KW - Decision Support Techniques
KW - Health Care Rationing
KW - Humans
KW - Italy
KW - Liver Diseases
KW - Liver Transplantation
KW - Patient Selection
KW - Severity of Illness Index
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/141899
UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(issn)1600-6143
U2 - 10.1111/ajt.13408
DO - 10.1111/ajt.13408
M3 - Article
SN - 1600-6135
VL - 15
SP - 2552
EP - 2561
JO - American Journal of Transplantation
JF - American Journal of Transplantation
ER -