TY - JOUR
T1 - 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) for the prevention of invasive pneumococcal diseases (IPDs) in the elderly: is it really effective?
AU - Cadeddu, Chiara
AU - De Waure, Chiara
AU - Gualano, Maria Rosaria
AU - Di Nardo, Francesco
AU - Ricciardi, Walter
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Introduction. Incidence of invasive pneumococcal diseases
(IPDs) in Italy is constantly increasing and that is particularly true
among the elderly. 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine
(PPV23) is recommended to this age group and offered in all
Italian regions. However, efficacy of PPV23 on preventing IPDs is
debated. We therefore performed a review of the most recent available
meta-analyses in order to assess the efficacy of PPVs.
Methods. The literature search was conducted using PubMed and
Scopus search engines. We used the following keywords: “pneumococcal”,
“polysaccharide”, “vaccine”, “efficacy”, “elderly”,
“meta analysis”. Only meta-analyses published in the last 7 years
were selected. We examined the results of the selected meta-analyses
and assessed their quality according to the PRISMA recommendations.
Results. The search returned 16 results in PubMed and 12 in
Scopus: among them we selected 3 meta-analyses. According to
our quality assessment, all meta-analyses showed generally positive
results and almost all items of the PRISMA checklist were
respected. However, the research protocol and the registration
number were absent in all the 3 revisions and the flow-chart was
not shown in Moberley’s and Melegaro’s works.
In the study by Huss et al. the relative risk of developing IPDs
among vaccinated subjects was 0.90 (95%CI: 0.46-1.77, I² 4.9%),
indicating a very slight benefit after vaccination. This contrasts with
the results of the Cochrane Review by Moberley et al., in which the
PPVs showed a protective efficacy in reducing the risk of IPDs of
74% (OR 0.26, 95%CI: 0.15-0.46) with no statistical heterogeneity
(I² 0%). Melegaro et al. found a reduction not statistically significant
of the incidence of IPD of 65% (OR 0.35; 95%CI 0.08-1.49)
among healthy elderly, while the global estimate of vaccine efficacy
among high risk elderly was minimal (OR 0.80; 95%CI 0.22-2.88).
Conclusions. Most of the studies suggest that the PPVs confer
low protection against IPDs. Anyhow, their methodological heterogeneity
does not allow definitive conclusions.
While waiting to see the results of new trials about the efficacy
of PPVs, in particular of PPV23, and the extension of the use of
conjugate vaccine among the population over 65, stakeholders
should be aware of the results of the meta-analyses discussed in
this paper during the implementation of the vaccination programs
for the elderly in Public Health
AB - Introduction. Incidence of invasive pneumococcal diseases
(IPDs) in Italy is constantly increasing and that is particularly true
among the elderly. 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine
(PPV23) is recommended to this age group and offered in all
Italian regions. However, efficacy of PPV23 on preventing IPDs is
debated. We therefore performed a review of the most recent available
meta-analyses in order to assess the efficacy of PPVs.
Methods. The literature search was conducted using PubMed and
Scopus search engines. We used the following keywords: “pneumococcal”,
“polysaccharide”, “vaccine”, “efficacy”, “elderly”,
“meta analysis”. Only meta-analyses published in the last 7 years
were selected. We examined the results of the selected meta-analyses
and assessed their quality according to the PRISMA recommendations.
Results. The search returned 16 results in PubMed and 12 in
Scopus: among them we selected 3 meta-analyses. According to
our quality assessment, all meta-analyses showed generally positive
results and almost all items of the PRISMA checklist were
respected. However, the research protocol and the registration
number were absent in all the 3 revisions and the flow-chart was
not shown in Moberley’s and Melegaro’s works.
In the study by Huss et al. the relative risk of developing IPDs
among vaccinated subjects was 0.90 (95%CI: 0.46-1.77, I² 4.9%),
indicating a very slight benefit after vaccination. This contrasts with
the results of the Cochrane Review by Moberley et al., in which the
PPVs showed a protective efficacy in reducing the risk of IPDs of
74% (OR 0.26, 95%CI: 0.15-0.46) with no statistical heterogeneity
(I² 0%). Melegaro et al. found a reduction not statistically significant
of the incidence of IPD of 65% (OR 0.35; 95%CI 0.08-1.49)
among healthy elderly, while the global estimate of vaccine efficacy
among high risk elderly was minimal (OR 0.80; 95%CI 0.22-2.88).
Conclusions. Most of the studies suggest that the PPVs confer
low protection against IPDs. Anyhow, their methodological heterogeneity
does not allow definitive conclusions.
While waiting to see the results of new trials about the efficacy
of PPVs, in particular of PPV23, and the extension of the use of
conjugate vaccine among the population over 65, stakeholders
should be aware of the results of the meta-analyses discussed in
this paper during the implementation of the vaccination programs
for the elderly in Public Health
KW - efficacy
KW - pneumococcal vaccine
KW - efficacy
KW - pneumococcal vaccine
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/36534
M3 - Article
SN - 1121-2233
SP - 101
EP - 103
JO - Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene
JF - Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene
ER -