What Role for Overriding Mandatory Provisions of Third Countries in Conflicts of Laws Relating to Rights in Rem in Moveable Non-cultural Property?

Pietro Franzina

doi:10.37417/PILRIRUE/19

What Role for Overriding Mandatory Provisions of Third Countries in Conflicts of Laws Relating to Rights in Rem in Moveable Non-cultural Property?

Pietro Franzina

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

I. The current reflection on a possible EU instrument on the law governing rights in rem. – II. The unilateralist flavour of the lex rei sitae rule: is there any room left for overriding mandatory provisions in the field of rights in rem? - III. The recovery of illegally transferred non-cultural objects. – IV. The enforcement of duties pertaining to the moveable assets in question. – V. Concluding remarks.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Private International Law on Rights in rem in the European Union. Derecho internacional privado sobre derechos reales en la Unión Europea
Editors	M. Font-Mas
Pages	469-476
Number of pages	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.37417/PILRIRUE/19
Publication status	Published - 2024

Keywords

Diritti reali
Diritto internazionale privato
Private international law
Rights in rem

Access to Document

10.37417/PILRIRUE/19

Cite this

Franzina, P. (2024). What Role for Overriding Mandatory Provisions of Third Countries in Conflicts of Laws Relating to Rights in Rem in Moveable Non-cultural Property? In M. Font-Mas (Ed.), Private International Law on Rights in rem in the European Union. Derecho internacional privado sobre derechos reales en la Unión Europea (pp. 469-476) https://doi.org/10.37417/PILRIRUE/19

@inbook{2513ebbf32474268be978fa4096dec72,

title = "What Role for Overriding Mandatory Provisions of Third Countries in Conflicts of Laws Relating to Rights in Rem in Moveable Non-cultural Property?",

abstract = "I. The current reflection on a possible EU instrument on the law governing rights in rem. {\textendash} II. The unilateralist flavour of the lex rei sitae rule: is there any room left for overriding mandatory provisions in the field of rights in rem? - III. The recovery of illegally transferred non-cultural objects. {\textendash} IV. The enforcement of duties pertaining to the moveable assets in question. {\textendash} V. Concluding remarks.",

keywords = "Diritti reali, Diritto internazionale privato, Private international law, Rights in rem, Diritti reali, Diritto internazionale privato, Private international law, Rights in rem",

author = "Pietro Franzina",

year = "2024",

doi = "10.37417/PILRIRUE/19",

language = "English",

isbn = "9788413818498",

pages = "469--476",

editor = "M. Font-Mas",

booktitle = "Private International Law on Rights in rem in the European Union. Derecho internacional privado sobre derechos reales en la Uni{\'o}n Europea",

}