Abstract
The judgment recently adopted by the Court of Justice of the European Union in the RINA case, however antici-
pated, is not particularly surprising. Not only the solution figured out by the Court of Justice is perfectly coherent
with the suggestion formulated by the Advocate General, but it is also thoroughly aligned with the previous
case-law of the CJEU on the interpretation of the notion of civil and commercial matters under Brussels I
Regulation, as well as with its previous assessment of the material scope of the jurisdictional immunities of the
State. Hence, the conclusion reached under the RINA judgment, pointing out that the contended issue fits in the
notion of civil and commercial matters and the recognized organizations providing class certificates and statu-
tory certificates are not entitled to invoke sovereign immunity with reference to conduct not amounting to an
exercise of public powers, is to be appreciated for its clarity and inner coherence.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Old questions and new confirmations: the scope of application of reg. 44/2001 and the boundaries of sovereign immunity according to the Court of Justice in the Rina case |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 1482-1499 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | RESPONSABILITÀ CIVILE E PREVIDENZA |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- certificazione e classificazione navale
- immunità sovrana
- materia civile e commerciale
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Old questions and new confirmations: the scope of application of reg. 44/2001 and the boundaries of sovereign immunity according to the Court of Justice in the Rina case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver