Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validation of the new AJCC TNM staging system for gastric cancer in a large cohort of patients (n = 2,155): Focus on the T category

  • A. Marchet*
  • , S. Mocellin
  • , A. Ambrosi
  • , P. Morgagni
  • , G. Vittimberga
  • , F. Roviello
  • , D. Marrelli
  • , Manzoni G. De
  • , A. Minicozzi
  • , A. Coniglio
  • , G. Tiberio
  • , Fabio Pacelli
  • , Fausto Rosa
  • , D. Nitti
  • *Corresponding author
  • University of Padua
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
  • Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital
  • University of Siena
  • University of Verona
  • University of Brescia

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

Background: The prognostic value of T subclassification in patients with gastric carcinoma has been just implemented in the new AJCC TNM staging system, which has reclassified T2a and T2b into T2 and T3 tumors, respectively. The aim of the present study was to validate the prognostic significance of the new T categorization within the frame of the latest TNM staging system. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 686 T2/T3 patients among 2155 subjects who underwent radical resection for gastric carcinoma at six Italian centers from 1988 through 2006. Results: Upon multivariate analysis, the new T categories, extent of lymph node dissection (D) and patient's age were retained by the survival model as independent prognostic factors. In particular, the death risk for patients with T3 tumors was higher than that of patients with T2 tumors (HR: 1.42, P = 0.005). Among the 686 patients previously classified as having T2 tumors, patients with T2 and T3 disease were 270 (39.4%) and 416 (60.6%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 55 months, the 5-year overall survival rates were 67.3% and 52.3% for patients with T2 and T3 tumors, respectively (P < 0.001). The survival advantage for the T2 as compared to T3 category was maintained even when N0 and N+ patients were separately considered (P = 0.0154 and P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Our data confirm the prognostic difference between the newly proposed T2 and T3 categories, which should be implemented in the routine clinical practice to improve risk stratification of patients with gastric cancer. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)779-785
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume37
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Keywords

  • 80 and over
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Gastric cancer
  • Humans
  • Lymphatic Metastasis
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Prognosis
  • Prognostic factors
  • Stomach Neoplasms
  • Survival Analysis
  • Survival analysis
  • TNM staging system

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of the new AJCC TNM staging system for gastric cancer in a large cohort of patients (n = 2,155): Focus on the T category'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this