Using Specific Model Statements to Elicit Information and Cues to Deceit in Information-Gathering Interviews

Cody Normitta Porter, Aldert Vrij, Sharon Leal, Zarah Vernham, Giacomo Salvanelli, Niall Mcintyre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Model Statements are designed to modify an interviewee's expectation of the amount of details required during an interview. This study examined tailored Model Statements, emphasising either spatial (Spatial-MS), or temporal (Temporal-MS) details, compared to a control condition (no-MS). Participants (63 liars, 63 truth-tellers) were randomly allocated to one of three interviewing conditions. Truth-tellers honestly reported a spy mission, whereas liars performed a covert mission and lied about their activities. The Spatial-MS elicited more spatial details than the control, particularly for truth-tellers. The Temporal-MS elicited more temporal details than the control, for truth-tellers and liars combined. Results indicate that the composition of different Model Statements increases the amount of details provided and, regarding spatial details, affects truth-teller's and liar's statements differently. Thus, Model Statements can be constructed to elicit information and magnify cues to deceit.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-142
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Investigative interviewing
  • Model Statement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using Specific Model Statements to Elicit Information and Cues to Deceit in Information-Gathering Interviews'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this