[Autom. eng. transl.] Is the analytical discourse comparable to psychotherapy? On the one hand it declares its therapeutic effects essential, on the other hand it does not suspend itself exclusively to these effects. With Freud we discover the paradox of a healing not linearly resulting from the disease: a subjective decision-making is needed, which is not only a conscious operation. With the instinctual turning point, in the elaboration between '14 and '20, pleasure-displeasure homeostasis enters a crisis. Infinite analysis, endless training for the impossible profession of the analyst operator. Lacan - re-editor of Freud- brings to light the problems that are delineated in the psychoanalyst's education, playing on the fact that psychoanalysis is not transmitted as any other knowledge. What kind of knowledge is at stake then? What kind of transmission?
|Translated title of the contribution||[Autom. eng. transl.] Univers-city. Uni-versity of knowledge, diversity of the subject|
|Number of pages||33|
|Publication status||Published - 2004|