[Autom. eng. transl.] The differences on freedom between Marcel and Sartre are grouped around a different use of the phenomenology of consciousness. According to Marcel, the irreducible opposition of being in oneself and of being for oneself is the result of a stiffening that makes the analysis of states of consciousness of the descriptive attitude that adheres to reality mythical behavior tending to exaggeration. At the center of these accusations are the Sartrian themes of the negativity and lack of consciousness. From this race to the abyss of nothingness are not questionable testimonies the themes of the absurd, the impossible god, nausea, pride, destruction, others as a threat, refusal of receptivity . The final impression will seem strange. It is the philosophy that argues against Sartre for his atheistic and infernal results that defends matter and receptivity, gift and grace. Because to receive is not to suffer, nor the spiritual to act gone mad.
|Translated title of the contribution||[Autom. eng. transl.] A fragile freedom. The controversy between Gabriel Marcel and Jean Paul Sartre|
|Number of pages||38|
|Journal||Présence de Gabriel Marcel|
|Publication status||Published - 2013|