Abstract
In its decision on assisted suicide (order no. 207 of 2018, on the case of Marco Cappato), for the first time the Italian Constitutional Court gives the grounds for a declaration of (partial) invalidity, but does not adopt it, and delays the final judgment, allowing the legislator some time to correct the relevant law. The essay is a first and tentative procedural commentary of this new technique of constitutional adjudication and its reasons: arguments of comparative law; the Court’s power to delay judgments; political discretion and its limits. Ultimately, only future developments will reveal how judicial modesty and activism will mix in this highly troubled matter.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] AN INTERLOCUTORY ORDER ON ASSISTED SUICIDE. PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS AT FIRST READING |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 1323-1342 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Rivista Italiana di Medicina Legale e del Diritto in Campo Sanitario |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- assisted suicide
- constitutional justice
- end of life
- legislative discretion
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] AN INTERLOCUTORY ORDER ON ASSISTED SUICIDE. PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS AT FIRST READING'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver