Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Un raffinato esempio di distinguishing. Se la fonte è il fatto, che deve fare il giudice quando il fatto cambia?

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] A refined example of distinguishing. If the source is the fact, what should the judge do when the fact changes?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The contribution examines the remission orders sent to the Constitutional Court on the point of vaccination obligations
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] A refined example of distinguishing. If the source is the fact, what should the judge do when the fact changes?
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalNUOVE AUTONOMIE
Volume2022
Publication statusPublished - 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Constitutional Court
  • Corte costituzionale
  • Obbligo vaccinale
  • Vaccine mandates

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] A refined example of distinguishing. If the source is the fact, what should the judge do when the fact changes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
View full fingerprint

Cite this