Un «monito» al legislatore sulle modalità di esecuzione del respingimento alla frontiera dello straniero

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] A "warning" to the legislator on how to implement the refusal of entry at the border of the alien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] With the sent. December 20, 2017, n. 275 the Court examines the question of constitutional legitimacy of the art. 10, paragraph 2, of Legislative Decree 286/1998, a provision that provides for the so-called "deferred" rejection, by means of a forced accompaniment of the foreigner at the border. The Court, while declaring the inadmissibility of the question due to lack of relevance, does not exempt itself from sending a "warning" to the legislator: the forced accompaniment to the border, precisely because it is a coercive measure, involves a restriction of personal freedom and therefore requires a regulation in accordance with what was established by art. 13, paragraph 3 of the Constitution, with particular reference to the respect of the reserve of jurisdiction established therein.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] A "warning" to the legislator on how to implement the refusal of entry at the border of the alien
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)468-471
Number of pages4
JournalQuaderni Costituzionali
Volume2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • frontiera
  • libertà personale
  • respingimento
  • riserva di giurisdizione

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] A "warning" to the legislator on how to implement the refusal of entry at the border of the alien'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this