Abstract
The paper offers a comment, at first reading, about the hearing postponement order (No. 207/2018) issued by the Constitutional Court, in order to make room for possible parliamentary decisions, regarding to the question of constitutional legitimacy of the art. 580 c.p. on the subject of abetment to suicide. The analysis of the motivation highlights the aporias that would derive from the recognition of a constitutional right to die “quickly”, given certain circumstances, and the reasons that do not allow considering as already taken by the Constitutional Court any decisions in this sense. Persisting difficulties to believe that such a transition can take place through an exclusive choice of constitutional judges, it is stressed the unacceptability of approaches intended to present the possible intervention of the legislator as a compelled one, and it is claimed the achievement of an equal relationship between the Parliament and the Constitutional Court (opened to a well-balanced analysis of the order, on the basis of what the legislator thoughtfully established by the law n. 219/2017).
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] A constitutional right to die "quickly"? On the necessary constitutionally oriented approach to the Court cost. (ord.) n. 207/2018 |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 1313-1322 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Rivista Italiana di Medicina Legale e del Diritto in Campo Sanitario |
| Volume | XL |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- abetment to suicide
- aiuto al suicidio
- decisioni di fine vita
- end-of-life decisions
- rapporti tra Corte costituzionale e Parlamento
- relations between the Constitutional Court and the Parliament
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] A constitutional right to die "quickly"? On the necessary constitutionally oriented approach to the Court cost. (ord.) n. 207/2018'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver