Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Un caso di traduzione: l'incontro tra Luciano e Alberti

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] A case of translation: the meeting between Luciano and Alberti

Massimo Marassi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Mattioli's thought about translation has both a historical and a theoretical aspect. Lucianism – as aesthetic, critic and philological-literary phenomenon – is the sign of the continuity of a style of thought which is different in every age within which it is received. In particular, the meeting between Lucian and Alberti is the most important of humanism, before the relationship between Erasmus and Lucian. Moreover, from a theoretical point of view, Mattioli prefers a phenomenological approach and asks himself "what is the sense of translating?". In his opinion, poetics and rhetoric are the essential structures of a translation: this takes into account his specific literary genre and the conception of the translator's mother tongue. Even from this point of view, a translation appears as a way to state an opinion in a given time span, to examine a personal relationship with history. In history, a translation is a way to propose responsibly practical models, which are qualitatively original in their difference. If the translation merely aims to become acceptable for the target culture the art work becomes a simple product.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] A case of translation: the meeting between Luciano and Alberti
Original languageItalian
Title of host publicationTra estetica, poetica e retorica. In memoria di Emilio Mattioli
EditorsRITA MESSORI
Pages157-182
Number of pages26
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • Alberti
  • Lucian
  • Luciano
  • Mattioli
  • Traduzione
  • Translation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] A case of translation: the meeting between Luciano and Alberti'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this