Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] In desire, of man and woman, there is asymmetry of positions. The objection to a complementarity of the masculine with the feminine, heroically produced by Freud as an enigmatic disymmetry and reformed from the post-Freud as the ethics of difference, strikes today against the egalitarian imaginary of our postmodern society in search of equality and well-being, in the clinic, at all costs. Beyond a Freudian Oedipal ideology, made even more decisive by the mother-infantile ideology typical of dopofreud, it is necessary to go all the way to the aporias of female sexuality, bringing into play the connection between the limit of the symbolic and the unconscious inscription of the sexual difference, whose question ends up being structurally the ultimate question of the subject, taken between the impossible representation of death and the feminine limit of the structure, 'rejection of the feminine position' with which Freud sanctions the term of the analysis. How does it occur in the current clinic?
Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Wholly |
---|---|
Original language | Italian |
Title of host publication | Desiderio di uomo. Desiderio di donna? |
Editors | Marisa Fiumanò |
Pages | 99-111 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Publication status | Published - 2007 |
Keywords
- Desiderio
- Femminilità
- Psicoanalisi
- sessualità